Search results

Then use ortega.

Really not viable, 3 look and you get diag/adj swap 5/6 solves = average 20+ moves Ortega is much better as there are fewer and faster algs. Im not sure what you have against adj/diag diag/adj, but the algs are very fast (faster than pure diag).

GBBO solutions: 29.33 and 25.00 means with 20 single :) Round 1 #1 #2 #3 Round 2 #1 #2 #3

I disassembled the cube until only the screws and centre bases were left on, then i got some pliers and cut of around half a centimetre off of the three sticky outy bits(the ends of the traingular centre base) on each base (24 in total). After reassembling there was a lot less catching than before.

Just did ~ 250 solves and broke all the UWRs :) Single 8.83 avg5 11.62 avg12 12.91 avg50 14.42 avg100 14.69 I managed to drop around 0.5 seconds after modifying my puzzle slightly so that's cool.

8.99 single and 12.99 ao5, sorry about the dodgy angle but i'm quite pleased I got the single on cam.

Nice, beats my 9.89 from 2 minutes ago :eek:

Here's a more in-depth explanation: first you make the first layer as normal. Then you would solve one of the corners + the E layer edge that would go beneath it. Then you would solve the same pieces for an adjacent corner + the U edge that goes between that corner and the previously solved...

I'm averaging around 16-17 seconds with a quite basic method me and Rob Yau came up with. It involves solving the first layer as normal and then reducing it down to 2 gen.

i got one a few weeks ago and have been averaging between 30 and 35 with a lucky single of 16.31. My method is: layer (doesnt need the centre) -> edges -> centres -> wings. sonetimes i solve centres and edges together.

DYK: Got a cheeky 1.90 on skewb which isn't even good slaughtered all chance of NR with a counting 4.8 Sub 10 on square-1 despite my 2nd fastest official solve being 12.xx I'm still terrible at pyra 1:09.xx in mega but a counting 1:3x.xx killed my average Oops, DNF'ed clock final Apparently...

3x3: sub 9 4x4: sub 39 5x5: sub 1:07 6x6:sub 2:10 7x7: sub 3:20 OH: sub 15 Feet: sub 1 BLD: sub 1:30 MBLD: 7+ Skewb: sub 2.9 Pyra: sub 4 Square1: sub 11 Mega: sub 1 Clock: sub 10 4BLD: succeed 5BLD: try and maybe succeed and be sub Harry in SoR

Paint [emoji23][emoji23]

19.34, 19.97, 19.40, (19.07), (23.22) = 19.58 pretty decent

Sorry, but I will not be attending because I have broken my leg. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

21.11, (23.56), 19.49, (15.63), 19.58 = 20.06avg

I think it's a 1/3 if i'm not mistaken

So i thought of this LL method which seems to be between beginners LL and full CLL. The idea is to orient all of your pieces and also permute two of them so that you would either get the easy PLL or a PLL skip recognition seems to be easy as it is only recognising where two stickers are in...

24.51, 24.11, (26.58), (20.34), 23.98= 24.20 ao5

z' x2 R U' R' U' L' U2 L U F U2 next: F R' U' F' U R' F2 R' U