Search results

No. It wasn't even interesting enough to justify the one.

Isn't it in the post you quoted?

It's been ~4 years since I last posted here. I took a long "break" from cubing to finish school and for other reasons. I didn't really think I would come back, at least not with as much intensity as I had back then. I was wrong and I really got sucked back in. A lot has changed in 4 years; the...

Use any PLL you want that swaps diagonal corners. You won't get a better alg than that. Why? Because it would already be one of the PLLs you could choose from.

Ellis: 18.09 (14.60, 20.36) I haven't really cubed in around 2 months, but nonetheless this is severely disappointing.

I haven't had a chance to read deadalnix's posts, but did you try frederico's yet? x' (U M' U' M) U2 (M U M' U) x

Hmm, I keep getting something like this for 25 move 6-gen 2x2 scramble

Be patient, learn algs, practice. The only thing that you're doing wrong is getting frustrated by expecting too much. Stick to a method, maybe get a new cube, and relax. Everyone that's fast was where you are now. No reason to get confused.

I would check again, I bet you they are all like that.

I say permutation of the last layer, but that the PLL 'permutes' the last layer pieces. Any way is fine though since it means the same thing. When you do the F2L in such a way the it's influencing the LL?

Nah. Maybe you just weren't specific enough. "People have slowed down light"? What do you mean by that? If you shine light into air it slows down, or water, or a plastic bottle. So yea, when you shine it into a cloud a molecules, it's going to slow down... big whoop.

............. Try shining light into...... ummmm ANYTHING Sorry, I don't want to sound rude... but seriously.

True, but I should have specified.

Well yea, oops. Even after the question I posed earlier :o I don't know why I was thinking external reference.

No. If a star is 4 light years away, there's no way anything is getting there in faster than 4 years (or in 4 years unless it is light itself).

Damn you're so freaking lazy... And you don't even have it yet? Go away.

But left roux's? I still don't understand the point of this thread.

No you don't. Expert village? pfft

Because it's wrong, in more ways than one. I wanted to give you a second chance. Sorry, I'm not here to argue or debate 100+ years of physics research, so I won't go much further. I was trying to propose an easy question that would help you think about it. The answer was no time, not ~8 minutes...

We've already verified SR, is that your final answer?