Search results

the 4.7 would've been around a 4.5 so still the fastest and therefore non-counting solve, and the 5.53 would've been like a 5.2 and therefore still the slowest and still not counting, so the avg would still remain 4.91 regardless

z2 R D R' D U L F' L' U2 L' U L y U L' U2 L y U L' U' L U' L' U L R U R2' F R F' U M2' U M U2 M' U M2'

ok

R2 F' L2 D2 F2 U2 B' L2 F R2 D2 F2 D L' U B R' F' R D R2 U2 z y2 // inspection U' R' r' L' // cross F' U F // 1st pair R' U' R U R' U' R // 2nd pair L U' L' // 3rd pair U y' U R U' R' U' R U' R2' F R // 4th pair U R U' R' U R U2' R' U' R U R' F' // OLL(CP) view at alg.cubing.net...

Jeremy Smith - 9:07.83 10x10 Single

Reconstructions: Feliks Zemdegs - 5.80 3x3 WR avg5

Bill Wang: 4.94+2 Official Single B2 F' U2 R F2 D L R' D' R2 D2 F D' B' D2 R2 F' x z2 // inspection R' U' F2 D // cross R' F U' F' R2 // 1st pair U' R' U y' U R' U' R // 2nd pair y' U' R U2 R' U' R U R' // 3rd pair R' U' R U2 R' U' R U R' U' R // 4th pair+OLS U R2 U R U R' U' R' U' R' U R'//...

the 4.96 single: R2 U L2 B2 U F2 R2 U' B2 L2 U' R2 F' R2 F U' L B' R B' D x2 // inspection D F' r' U r // cross U' R U R' U y' R' U' R // 1st pair U2 R U R' // 2nd pair y' R U' R' // 3rd pair y' R U R' d' L' U L // 4th pair U' r U R' U R U2 r' // OLL(CP) R U R' U R' U' R2 U' R' U R' U R U //...

whoops! fixed, cheers surprised you didn't notice such a noob mistake when you were fixing my formatting ;)

Reconstructions: Bill Wang - 5.42 3x3 avg5 (unofficial)

Feliks Zemdegs - 41.24 5x5 Single

Reconstructions: Bill Wang - 5.31 3x3 avg5 (unofficial)

Feliks Zemdegs - 1:25.71 6x6 single (Unofficial)

hahaha please be joking, for a 55 move solve @ 8tps that's a solve of 6.875 seconds or below, and for a 60 move solve that's 7.5 seconds or below. considering out of the top 100 solves i'd say most are below 50 moves (thus below 8 tps), then that leaves a very small amount of solves done at 8tps...

F2 L' B2 R2 B2 D2 L D2 F2 R' B2 U' B D' U2 R2 B2 F' R' B' R2 x' // inspection r' U' D' L F' D' // cross U' R U' R2' U R2 // 1st pair U' R' U' L' U' L U2 L U' L' // 2nd pair y' U2' R' U' R // 3rd pair y' U2' R' U' R U R' U' R // 4th pair U' U l' U' L U' L' U2 l // OLL(CP) U2' // AUF 44 HTM -...

Feliks' 5.39 was 10.39 ETPS

They should be specic, e.g. Minh Thai would have "Former Rubik's Cube world record holder - 22.95 seconds" etc. "WCA records", "World records" and so on can easily be misinterpreted as current records

yeah, my point was just that the quote isn't current, which could be misleading, just like how he has "world records" etc listed instead of "former world records"

that doesn't seem right... (L M') (U D) M'

whoops, cheers