I use r’ (U2 r U2 r U2) r2 F2 (r’ U2 r’ U2) F2 r2 F2, it's basically a slightly different execution of the most popular alg. The F2 moves feel pretty much like righty U2s
^lol.
On a more serious note though, I've had two minor flus, and I even got vaccinated! I can't say much about comps though, since my city rarely has them, but I bet all the scrambling and sharing cubes isn't helping with the spread of germs.
Are there theoretical 3-gen solutions for cases that require them using a combination of any three faces?
For example, for every RUF PLL are there also RUD/RUL solutions?
It is interesting to note that for the time being Rubik's Brand has withdrawn their lawsuit in response to The Cubicle's counter-suit. Rubik's could easily file their lawsuit again, but this development still seems hopeful to me. This is something that seems to be getting overlooked in the...
I think it's pretty tough to find a newer cube with darker shades, but I had a stickerless aolong V2 that had really nice shades that were quite a bit darker than the more recent stickerless cubes. Anyone else?
Gotcha! So LMCF can be both one of the most or least algorithmic methods, deepending on how much one is willing to learn? If so, that's pretty cool. :)
Wouldn't someone who gets sub-10 using ZZ-OCLL/PLL be using just as few algs? If I'm not mistaken, this is not to uncommon (I'm pretty sure Phil Yu does it all the time).
And those are based on how long it takes the average person to gain a certain level of proficiency. I wonder if the 'hours of instruction' time could be done using hour of practice of practice instead.
Edit: and that would be for hours of practice to reach some standardizeable level of...