Search results

Scramble your cube with the following algorithm: U Challenge: Solve the cube without turning the U face. Then, do it as afst as possible Jim Mertens showed me this in Lexington, its fun to try to fidure it out on your own. This means you can't do d moves or E moves either. (You can do...

1.21 Y Perm: 0.75 2Bar PBL 0.81 J Perm You can find the algs in the video descriptions

I'm just beginning to look at doing 4x4 BLD, and I read Mike's tutorial on centers. He suggested when looking at the cycles, for whatever color comes next you choose the next center on that face alphabetically (they start in the top left and go clockwise) that is not yet solved. I was thinking...

First Round 3.53 avg: (2.65) (6.02) 2.93 3.86 3.81 = 3.53 avg Final Round 3.61 avg: 3.59 3.55 (3.25) 3.69 (4.43) = 3.61 avg So I got to 8 straight avgs with a sub-3 before the finals, but i did get two in the first round so thats 9 sub-3s in my last 9 avgs. Almost a completely sub 4...

Has anyone tried this? I wonder what would happen... I would do it but I only have one cube for each event pretty much...

Nice average! 2.46 (2.33) 3.08 2.46 (3.25) = 2.67 avg I think this is fastest on youtube The first was a PBL skip after a not too great OFOTA case yeah derrick pointed out my long insection on solve 2, sry : )

my 1:02.22 4x4 avg with 55.86 single: Pretty good. That last solve's LL could not have been worse OP and N perm which was 19 seconds. This avg may have been sub 60 if not for that. The times: 1:02.83 O 58.88 55.86 1:11.72 P 1:04.96 OP = 1:02.22 avg my 23.50 funny OH single: My...

13.67 avg: Nice Average! Messed up the cross on the first one, could've had a sub 13.5 avg. Times: 15.15 12.65 (16.88) 13.21 (12.43) 9.44 single: This was the last solve in the first round of 3x3 at Lexington. My average was 14.80. The LL was an antisune and then U2

This could've been SO much faster! Now I've gotta wait till Indiana Open to break the WR :). Times: (2.66) 3.22 (5.43) 4.58 3.56 = 3.79 avg NAR Also: Although my finals average was pretty bad, I managed to get a sub 3, which makes 7 straight averages in a row with a sub-3 (an UWR :)...

Thanks to Waris and Laura for filming! Too bad I couldn't beat sam's or patrick's record. It was a 9 move solve for the 1.86 Times: 4.36 3.59 (1.86) 3.65 (4.44)

Average: 13.59 Fastest Time: 09.27 Slowest Time: 16.15 Standard Deviation: 01.49 Individual Times: 1) 12.44 B' F' L D2 B2 F L2 R D2 B2 L' U F2 L2 F L B2 L F U2 B' F L2 B2 R2 2) (16.15) L R2 D L2 U2 B' L R B2 U R D R D L2 R F L F2 B2 D2 B F2 D2 R 3) 13.68 U' R2 B D2 U2 B' F2 D' R' F D' U' R2 L...

x U2 R' U' R U2 x+R' U R' U' R2

For the #31 Contest on Speedsolving. Average/Good solves for all of them. I can cut off the most time on the 4x4, but its still good. Times: 2: 0:03 5: 1:48 4: 1:05 P 3: 0:14 Cubes: 2: Eastsheen 5: V-Cube (black) 4: Eastsheen 3: Store-bought

I should have kept filming! This went on to be a non lucky 3.08 avg of 12 with a best avg of of 2.91. When I was retrying the scrambles, I got a lucky 1.69 on the 4th scramble that would've made this avg of 5 2.76 and the avg of 12 would've been 2.96! Here's the times of the avg of 12. First...

Stupid computer changed focus away from JNet, so me hitting the spacebar didn't stop the timer, so I had to look at the frames anyway, awesome time! No parity. 10-18-18 were the approximate splits

For the 3x3 First Round, I got 15.26 avg 14.69 (13.81) 14.93 (17.43) 16.15 = 15.26 In the Final Round, I got 14.32, and ended the comp on my best solve 14.05 13.80 (19.00) 15.11 (11.86) = 14.32

I broke the NAR twice. It was at the Minnesota Open 2008. First round 3.92 avg (former NAR): Pretty nice solves. not really lucky, that last one was just easy and its my PB in comps and 5th in the world. This was the former NAR (I broke it later) and it put me at third in the world 4.03...

barely slipped into top 100 for single and avg and barely pre qualififed for nationals! 2x2 and 3x3 vids up very soon

not too bad for my second attempt ever. I'll have more vids up soon

My timer was broken, so I had to use JNet, probably would've been a couple tenths slower on a stackmat, but still awesome! I RAed te first 3 solves. [4.31] [4.12] [5.91] 3.33 3.69 3.55 4.03 (6.39+) 2.89 (2.75) 3.34 4.05 3.38 3.17 4.98 = 3.64 If only I hadn't had that +2 and the last 4.98, it...