Search results

No, that isnt the problem, its just that its a really bad method lol

R U serious bro?

Yep, I just realized it's basically MGLS.

Totally normal, that twelve was pretty miserable, but these two sevens somehow got me a sub-9 average. Barely. Average: 8.99 Time List: 1. 7.11 B L2 B2 F2 U F2 D' U' R2 U B2 R D2 R2 D L' F2 D' R2 B 2. 7.32 U2 R2 F2 U' B2 U' F2 R2 D' R U' R' D2 B D2 L' F2 D2 L' 3. 12.31 B U2 B2 L2 U R2...

L10P - A new alternative to LS/LL So everyone knows that CFOP, Petrus and ZZ, among other popular methods use an F2L/LL system. Essentially, one solves the first two layers of the cube, and then solves the final layer most often using two algorithms. Here is what I propose: 1. F2L-1 2. L5E...

2x2: sub-4 avg (3.89), no sub-3 single (3.08 was best), got to finals and placed 6th 3x3: sub-14 avg (13.89), no sub-10, sub got two 10.x singles (10.28 was best, Y perm ruined it), got to finals and placed 6th 4x4: screwed up everything, no goals were achieved 5x5: used Hoya for no reason...

A very short answer for this one: no. Don't call yourself a cubing athlete, because non-cubers will kill you.

Lolwut z L D' L D' // Goes for red cross z y F L R U R' F2 U' R2 // Gives up and goes for white cross U L U' L' // Free pair in the back R U' R' U2 F U F' // Decent pair U' R U2 R' U F' U' F // Bad pair d L U' L' fw' L' fw // Rotationless like a boss F U R U' R2 F' R U R U' R' // OLL +...

8.15 w/ a weird CFOP-ified Roux/Petrus thing z2 D // BD edge U R2 U' R // FB R2 U2 M' U M U2 M' U2 M // EO + 2x2x3 U R2 U R' U R U2 R' U R2 U' R' U2 R U R' // 2-gen F2L R U2 R' U' R U' R' // CO U' R U R' U' R' F R2 U' R' U' R U R' F' U' // PLL 51 moves w/o cancellations :P

Just try to practise a lot, sub-20 isn't that hard IMO

PB ao100 = 10.76 :) Generated By csTimer on 2016-1-29 solves/total: 100/100 single best: 6.95 worst: 14.20 mean of 3 current: 10.01 (σ = 0.41) best: 9.02 (σ = 1.14) avg of 5 current: 10.01 (σ = 0.41) best: 9.42 (σ = 0.83) avg of 12 current: 10.21 (σ = 0.94)...

Maybe I just can't understand. My PB is 6.5, but I have a lot of sub-7s, and I'm still super happy with a 6.6 or a 6.7 because I know that I am close to my PB and I'm getting good times. Heck, I'm happy when I get a sub-9, and my PB ao5 is sub-9. Just because you get alot of one time, so long as...

Perhaps so, but consider this: if your PB is not considered great, you obviously think you're better than you actually are. If your PB ao12 is 12.xx, you aren't sub-12, you just expect/want to be.

I understand that, but at least be happy with what you got. It just seems excessive, and at that point you're just trying to make people think you're better than you really are.

Lol I see so many people doing this "Fairly decent, 0.05 away from PB", how is that fairly decent? If it is nearly your PB, how is it just decent. Please people, stop doing this, if you are happy with an average, don't pass it off as not much just so people will think you're capable of soooo...

Nice job, but I beat your UWR. 1.89: F2 R2 U2 B2 D2 U2 B2 D2 R2 U2 B2 L2 R2 B2 U2 Solution: z2 F2 M2 E2 Sorry :P

Goals for Vancouver Open: 2x2: sub-4 avg, sub-3 single, get to finals 3x3: sub-14, sub-10 single, get to finals 4x4: sub-1, sub-50 single 5x5: sub-2, sub-1:50 single OH: sub-30, sub-25 single I'm setting my goals pretty high because I get super nervous during comps, so hopefully this time I...

I was thinking a lot about solving EO with pseudo pairs and came up with some random Roux/CFOP variant thing that solves EO with the F2B through pseudo pairs. Here are the steps: 1. 3x1x1 block on DL 2. Complete a Roux FB and SB and solve EO through pseudo pairs At this point there are two...

Cool solve with this weird Petrus variant I've been using Time: 10.91 R' F2 B2 U B2 L2 D' B2 D' F2 L2 U' B' D' R D F' B L R' F' x2 R' U B U D' B2 // 2x2 y' U' F' U2 R' F2 R' F // EO R' U R2 U' F2 U M' U2 M // 2x2x3 R2 U' R' U' R U R' U' R U R' // F2L U' R' U' R U' R' U2 R U // ZBLL

i cri evrytim Average: 10.04 Time List: 1. 12.23 F2 B R' D2 F2 L U D' R' L2 D R2 B2 U' F2 L2 F2 B2 U' L2 2. 12.73 B' R2 F L2 F U2 R2 F' D2 F2 D2 L F' L2 F' U2 F L2 U' F2 R' 3. 12.37 D F U2 B2 R2 L B' L2 F' R' L2 B2 L2 U' F2 U2 R2 U2 B2 U L2 4. 13.42 B2 U' R2 U B2 U2 B2 L2 D' R2 B U...