Recent content by Maple Feng

I think there is no need to make a version of single, as the average result can better reflect a player's true level, eliminating the influence of luck.

Actually it is based on average, except for the 4 blindfolded events. It will probably give a higher score in the popular events, that may because there are more beginners in the popular events like 3x3 and 2x2, than which in the less popular events like sq-1, fmc and 3x3 mbf. However, the...

Yeah, I also want to make a leaderboard but I’m only a yr2 cs student, so it will be technically difficult to make something like that (calculating thousands of cuber’s score may cost a lot of resource). I wish someone can make it and the project is open source with MIT license

Haha, This marking system is more strict than which in the school, and the highest overall score in the world is only 93. Even Feliks Zemdegs can only get 83 pts, although we thought he is a legend of the Rubik's Cube. But I think it will give a higher score than Kinch, right?

Sure, the 'overall score' will sum your events scores and divide by 17 (no matter how many events you have taken). There is another score called 'My Events', and that will only divide you score sum by 4. So the more events you take, the higher 'overall score' you will get. : )

Recently, I have created a website: cuber score It is mainly based on the your rank's “position” among all the cubers who have the result on each event. For example, if you are the top 1% level of all the competitors at WCA in 333, you will get 90 pts for 333. For the details, you may go to the...