Recent content by irontwig

Yikes, that's some serious workflow.

D' R D B2 D' B D F2 U' B' R2 B' R2 B' R B2 R2 B2 R2 B2 R' B' U2 F2 D2 F R2 (27) D' R //EO D B2 D' B D F2 U' //DR (R2 F' D2 F2 U2) //2x2x3 (B R2.B R2 B R2 B) //L4E .=R' B2 R2 B2 R2 B2 R' Next: F' D2 B R2 F L2 B' R2 D2 U2 L' U' L R D2 U' R2 F' D U R2

Very impressive and 5 moves better than Walker at the same comp.

1. 41 in 6:55.21 (47.92 points) 2. 38 in 6:46.87 (44.78 points) 3. DNF, didn't feel like it. 4. 41 in 6:44.52 (47.74 points) 5. 39 in 10:18.75 (49.31)

In my opinion we dont need a hard time limit for the linear scoring, as (relatively) long attempts are already discouraged by the scoring itself.

Would it be possible to generate images of the scrambles for FMC, using VisualCube or something else?

1: DNF 2: 37 in 7:24.87 (219.52 points) 3. DNF, looks like I miscrambled :/ 4. DNF, real waste of the nice start 5. 38 in 7:58.98 (234.52 points) This was stressful, though I would probably done a bit better if had more than one cube at hand (not at home at the moment).

F R' L2 U //Square L2 U2 F' R' F2 U' //FB+Square L2 U' B2 L2 F' L B' L' F L2 B U //SB+CMLL+EO (lol) M B2 M' B M2 B' M B2 R' L' //LSE Next: L2 B2 L2 R2 D2 U' B2 U' R2 U' L' F' U F2 L D2 F L R B

R' F U' L2 R U // FB F' R' L2 D L' R' U' B' U B U L' //SB+CMLL B' R L' D' R L' //EO F L2 R2 B' //L&R F2 L R' D2 //M Next: F' R2 D2 F2 U2 F D2 B U2 F' R U2 L' D2 B2 F R D' B F'

L' U' L U' L2 F2 L B L' F2 L B' U2 L (14) L' U' L U' L'.U2 L //Leaving three corners .=L' F2 L B L' F2 L B' Next: B2 R U2 R2 B2 U2 B2 R B2 R2 U2 B U R' U' R U2 B2 R2

y' F2 L2 U' D L2 U2 L' //S1 R U2 F' U' F' U' //S2 z' U R' F R //S3 y' R' U2 R2 U2 R' U' R2 U2 R U R' U2 R //S4 r U R' U' r' F R F' //S5+6 (Clix) R2 U S' U2 S U R2 U' //S7 (Allan) Very orthodox. Next: B2 R2 U2 F R2 B R2 F2 U2 R2 B D U L F' L U F L2 R' U

Speed Heise: F2 L' U' L U F U' F // Leaving three corners R2 D' R2 D R2 U2 R2 D' R2 D R2 // Per special Next: L2 R2 B' L2 F' D2 F2 U2 B' D2 F' R' U B U2 B' U R2 B

R2 F' U F U' L' E2 L2 u2 //S1+2 x U2 R' F R F2 U2 F U' R' U R y U R U R' //S3+4 L U' R' U L' U' R U2 y R2 x D2 R U2 R' D2 R U2 R //S5+6+7 Next: D2 L2 U2 L2 B' L2 U2 B2 U2 B F2 U' L2 U F R U' R2 D2 F2 R

How about score=moves+k*time, where k is some number. It has the pros that * Easier for competitors to gauge their score during an attempt. * Allows us to carefully choose a k which we feel gives a good balance between speed and movecount. * Should discourage multi-hour attempts, unless k is small.

Oh, missed that logarithm, my bad. Is there any upper time limit? As it is now, 38 in two minutes would be about the same score as 20 in three hours. One of these sound more like speed FMC than the other.