• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

0.54 2x2 NAR single disqualified

OtaMota

Legend
Joined
Feb 16, 2023
Messages
3,827
Location
Southeast USA
WCA
2024MOUR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Edit: here’s what the post said
Dear WCA Community,

The WRC was recently made aware of a video from ArCubingFest Queretaro 2018, where we could see a competitor performing a 0.54 2x2 Solve, this being the North American Record at that time. After some analysis, we have determined that the cube was in fact misscrambled, with a 3 move optimal solution (R U R’), rather than the intended 4 move optimal solution (U’ R U R’).

As you may already know, the optimal solution for any official 2x2 scrambles has a minimum of 4 moves [(Regulation 4b3b)](https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/regulations/#4b3b). The WRC held a vote to confirm our decision to DNF the attempt, in line with our approach for handling misscrambles at the time. Note that if this were to happen under the current Regulations, the solve would be marked as DNS as per [Regulation 11i1](https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/regulations/#11i1).

The WRC knows this was a long time ago, but the team is still in charge of making sure that all attempts comply with WCA Regulations, both now and in past years as well, hence this decision.
 
Last edited:
So there was a 0.54 and a 0.56 at the same comp, but the 0.54 was misscramble:
 
More importantly the WCA affirms it will apply rules to past solves, mostly sliding
Will this effect Feliks Zemdeg's 6.88 former 3x3x3 One Handed World Record single? From my understandment, the biggest excuse for why this record was turned a blind eye despite breaking rules was that it was recognised as valid before discovering that it was invalid as detailed by regulation. I understand the arguments for it but it has always called into question the integrity and professionalism of the WCA, for me.
 
Back
Top