Alextk
Regular
Im a bit curious if somebody has tried to solve a square 1 blindfolded?
Square-1 BLD
- Thread starter Alextk
- Start date
floan
Member
DennisStrehlau
Veteran
I did it twice, one DNF and one succesfull one.
But its just nasty, because i had problems with the movement:fp
You have to practise the algs that you want to use for blindfolded solving so long, so you can do them really absolutely perfectly. Doing the square 1 blindfolded isnt really that hard. I would say, that a 4x4x4 BLD is harder, am i right???
Greetings, Dennis
But its just nasty, because i had problems with the movement:fp
You have to practise the algs that you want to use for blindfolded solving so long, so you can do them really absolutely perfectly. Doing the square 1 blindfolded isnt really that hard. I would say, that a 4x4x4 BLD is harder, am i right???
Greetings, Dennis
Swordsman Kirby
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2006
- Messages
- 1,802
I did it twice, one DNF and one succesfull one.
But its just nasty, because i had problems with the movement:fp
You have to practise the algs that you want to use for blindfolded solving so long, so you can do them really absolutely perfectly. Doing the square 1 blindfolded isnt really that hard. I would say, that a 4x4x4 BLD is harder, am i right???
Greetings, Dennis
I'd say cubeshape is harder than centers.
rahulkadukar
Veteran
you need to be able to trace the Edges and Corners the rest is easy
DennisStrehlau
Veteran
I did it twice, one DNF and one succesfull one.
But its just nasty, because i had problems with the movement:fp
You have to practise the algs that you want to use for blindfolded solving so long, so you can do them really absolutely perfectly. Doing the square 1 blindfolded isnt really that hard. I would say, that a 4x4x4 BLD is harder, am i right???
Greetings, Dennis
I'd say cubeshape is harder than centers.
Absolutely, but when you are used to it, it becomes more and more easy. And i also meant, that you have to memorize much more on the 4x4x4, the Square 1, as i remember, is even less than a 3x3x3, i mean to memorize.Greetings, Dennis
cubeninjaIV
Regular
how do you do it and whats the method?
could you maybe make a tutorial or tell me where you learned
could you maybe make a tutorial or tell me where you learned
joey
Member
Garh.
It's just speed BLD, aka trace then entire solve.
Or at least trace the cube shape, and then do like an old pochmann style solve.
It's just speed BLD, aka trace then entire solve.
Or at least trace the cube shape, and then do like an old pochmann style solve.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2007
- Messages
- 11,923
- Location
- Indianapolis
- WCA ID
- 2007HUGH01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Thanks, joey. I appreciate the additional incentive to work on changing that. I think I'll go work a little on it right now.
Edit: It took me another year, but I finally got around to it. My method is here:
http://skarrie.se/square1blind/
I can sub-10 square-1 BLD consistently now with this method. Sub-5 should be very easy to get to.
Last edited:
Similar threads
