AlexMaass
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 1,547
- Location
- America, New York, Long Island
- WCA ID
- 2011MAAS01
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
Indiana 2015
wut
Last edited by a moderator:
[WR] 6x6 Single - 1:33.55 Kevin Hays
- Thread starter AlexMaass
- Start date
Indiana 2015
wut
JamesDanko
Regular
GJ! Wow!
guysensei1
Legend
holy nice
Lazy Einstein
Alg Ninja
Amazing. Truly amazing.
Aussie
Regular
- Joined
- May 14, 2014
- Messages
- 235
- Location
- Nashville, Tennessee
- WCA ID
- 2014GREE02
- YouTube
- Visit Channel
I was there when it happened, it was SO AWESOME!! I can't believe I actually got to see it with my own eyes...!!
I'm just really glad no one squealed.
I'm just really glad no one squealed.
Dene
Premium Member
I remember, back in the day, when I said 6x6 times would be 1:30, and all the haters said I was stupid. Ha! Take that, haters.
pyr14
Veteran
wow, thrashed it by 7 seconds.
Hays
Veteran
Switched to the AoShi. It's the best. Would recommend.
Buy here: http://thecubicle.us/moyu-aoshi-p-3638.html
Hilarious average.
Got a 1:29.99 right before this Unofficial.
Buy here: http://thecubicle.us/moyu-aoshi-p-3638.html
Hilarious average.
Got a 1:29.99 right before this Unofficial.
Last edited by a moderator:
Schmidt
Veteran
Quitting is OP
Praetorian
Veteran
speed and control is insane..
Iggy
Legend
Woah nice! And wow 1:29.99
D
Deleted member 19792
Guest
This is crazy.
#THANKYOUKEVIN2015
#THANKYOUKEVIN2015
Please Dont Ask
Veteran
Watch the video at speed 2
Its insane!!
Its insane!!
Antonie faz fan
Veteran
very much GJ
Christopher Mowla
Premium Member
I thought Kevin was retiring from cubing! (I guess that was just a rumor.) Good thing he didn't. 
This is a very interesting WR time because it now makes a formula I wrote back in 2012 match the WR times for the 4x4x4 through 7x7x7 cubes much more accurately. (The function takes in the current 3x3x3 WR avg of 5.)
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"][/TD]
[TD="align: center"]WR Single Time[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Predicted Time[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]4x4x4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]21.97s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]20.6216s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]5x5x5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]48.42s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]44.8786s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]6x6x6[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]93.55s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]90.1291s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]7x7x7[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]154.64s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]155.077s[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 400, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]Of course, I initially said that this formula was to calculate potential WR averages of 5 of the non-virtual nxnxn cube, but since a single WR is the best an average can be, it is technically the "potential".[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
This is a very interesting WR time because it now makes a formula I wrote back in 2012 match the WR times for the 4x4x4 through 7x7x7 cubes much more accurately. (The function takes in the current 3x3x3 WR avg of 5.)
[TABLE="class: grid, width: 250, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"][/TD]
[TD="align: center"]WR Single Time[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Predicted Time[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]4x4x4[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]21.97s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]20.6216s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]5x5x5[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]48.42s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]44.8786s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]6x6x6[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]93.55s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]90.1291s[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="align: center"]7x7x7[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]154.64s[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]155.077s[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 400, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]Of course, I initially said that this formula was to calculate potential WR averages of 5 of the non-virtual nxnxn cube, but since a single WR is the best an average can be, it is technically the "potential".[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Last edited:
hubingjushi
Regular
Holy crap.......It's not human being......
Last edited:
