• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Unofficial] 1:36.29 3BLD Average of 5

SirWaffle

SirWaffle

SHJ
Joined
Sep 14, 2012
Messages
1,455
Location
South Carolina, USA
WCA
2013WEAV01
YouTube
Visit Channel
[video=youtube_share;rYqBDXa0Zc8]http://youtu.be/rYqBDXa0Zc8[/video]

1. 1:31.91 B2 F2 U2 L2 D' L2 D' F2 L2 B2 U2 B' F2 L U F2 R' B D' F' R2
2. 1:26.77 L R F2 U2 L' F2 U2 L2 R F2 D F2 D' B2 F D2 B' U F2 R'
3. (DNF(1:36.27)) L2 F2 L2 B' D2 R2 F2 D2 L2 F' R B2 F U' F' D' B2 L' F' R2
4. (1:18.86) R2 D2 L' U2 F2 U2 R B2 F2 U2 R U' B' L2 D F' U2 B2 F D2
5. 1:50.20 L2 D L2 D R' U2 F' B R' B R2 B2 D F2 D' L2 F2 L2 B2 U'

Maskow better watch out, I'm coming for him in multi bld and 3bld, I even have the same red and black earmuffs as him(i think?)... lol
 
Nice T-Shirt.

BTW. Why M2? IMO "Old Pochmann -> TuRBo Edges/Old Pochman Corners -> TuRBo edges/commutators corners -> commutators" are the best way of improving. There is no place for M2 and I have no idea why people are still using this method :P
 
Maskow said:
Nice T-Shirt.

BTW. Why M2? IMO "Old Pochmann -> TuRBo Edges/Old Pochman Corners -> TuRBo edges/commutators corners -> commutators" are the best way of improving. There is no place for M2 and I have no idea why people are still using this method :P
Click to expand...

I guess some people just want to be decently fast at BLD, and are happy with times around a minute. M2 is good for that.

I found it pretty easy to transition to commutators with from M2 and I don't really see the problem with it (The only thing is that I think we should teach "advanced M2", which teaches it as a 3 cycle method instead of normal M2, which teaches it as a 2 cycle method). Do you think that UF is a better edge buffer than DF?
 
Maskow said:
Nice T-Shirt.

BTW. Why M2? IMO "Old Pochmann -> TuRBo Edges/Old Pochman Corners -> TuRBo edges/commutators corners -> commutators" are the best way of improving. There is no place for M2 and I have no idea why people are still using this method :P
Click to expand...

Why do you think M2 is no good?

I find it a nice mediocre step while learning commutators for edges... It's easy to incorporate some fast and easy commutators to your solves with it and solve the cases you don't know yet with M2. And then gradually increase the amount of commutators and lessen the amount of actual M2-method used.

Well of course if you find UF to be clearly superior buffer compared to DF, that could be one reason. Can't really come up with anything but that... But I would love to hear more your opinions about this :)
 
Maskow said:
Nice T-Shirt.

BTW. Why M2? IMO "Old Pochmann -> TuRBo Edges/Old Pochman Corners -> TuRBo edges/commutators corners -> commutators" are the best way of improving. There is no place for M2 and I have no idea why people are still using this method :P
Click to expand...

Omg you commented on my video, this has made my day <3

And I have looked into turbo but had been told by several people that it sucks so i never bothered learning it fully. But I think I will now!
 
I agree with Maskow and "UF is a better buffer". Most of the fastest in the world use the UF buffer despite M2's popularity and some of the really fast people wish they didn't use DF, but it was the standard progression from M2. Parity is easier and it's a better alg set.
 
A Leman said:
I agree with Maskow and "UF is a better buffer". Most of the fastest in the world use the UF buffer despite M2's popularity and some of the really fast people wish they didn't use DF, but it was the standard progression from M2. Parity is easier and it's a better alg set.
Click to expand...

Yeah. It is, but I find the difference to be quite small after all compared to DF. During parity you save a few moves (2-4 maybe) but not really all that much...

I might wrong though. After all I'm not quite as fast as maskow :P
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

AJT17
[AsR] Yifan Wang 15.80 3BLD Average
Replies
7
Views
535
OtaMota
OtaMota
C
[WR] Tommy Cherry 13.97 3BLD Average
Replies
18
Views
1,155
iguana
iguana
pi=3.14
[ER] Charles Daloz-Baltenberger 15.06 3BLD Average
Replies
3
Views
483
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
mdcuber9
[ER] Charles Daloz-Baltenberger 16.10 3BLD Average
Replies
1
Views
427
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
abunickabhi
[Unofficial] Jeff Park 14.74s 3BLD average
Replies
5
Views
627
bluecubing
bluecubing
Back
Top