Speedsolving.com ID | Kinch Score | Competitions | Completed Solves |
---|---|---|---|
ottozing | 10.98 | 38 | 127 |
Event | SR | Single | Average | SR | Kinch Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2x2x2 | 642 | 1.26Week 2013-51 2.91 4.97 DNF 1.26 1.64 | 3.17Week 2013-51 6th Place 2.91 4.97 DNF 1.26 1.64 | 1206 | 24.29 |
3x3x3 | 713 | 7.52Week 2015-09 7.99 7.52 11.28 9.07 8.81 | 8.62Week 2015-09 1st Place 7.99 7.52 11.28 9.07 8.81 | 517 | 53.75 |
4x4x4 | 1483 | 47.72Week 2012-38 51.61 47.72 50.69 53.05 53.37 | 51.78Week 2012-38 4th Place 51.61 47.72 50.69 53.05 53.37 | 1293 | 44.98 |
2x2x2 blindfolded | 330 | 5.68Week 2015-09 1st Place 5.68 6.89 DNF | 28.87 | ||
3x3x3 one-handed | 519 | 13.47Week 2015-09 14.49 14.35 17.83 17.17 13.47 | 15.34Week 2015-09 1st Place 14.49 14.35 17.83 17.17 13.47 | 356 | 52.28 |
3x3x3 Fewest moves | 6 | 19Week 2023-36 22 19 DNF | 20.67Week 2023-47 1st Place 20 22 20 | 3 | 96.76 |
Pyraminx | 1324 | 3.94Week 2015-09 5.07 4.95 4.39 3.94 5.37 | 4.80Week 2015-09 2nd Place 5.07 4.95 4.39 3.94 5.37 | 827 | 23.82 |
Square-1 | 863 | 15.90Week 2015-09 18.79 21.18 16.90 18.57 15.90 | 18.09Week 2015-09 2nd Place 18.79 21.18 16.90 18.57 15.90 | 660 | 24.51 |
Skewb | 823 | 3.43Week 2015-09 3.43 4.01 3.75 4.70 3.44 | 3.73Week 2015-09 2nd Place 3.43 4.01 3.75 4.70 3.44 | 262 | 35.03 |
Gold | Silver | Bronze |
---|---|---|
17 | 7 | 5 |
Competition | Place | Single | Average | Solves | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2x2x2 | ||||||||
2013-51 | 6 | 1.26 | 3.17 | 2.91 | 4.97 | (DNF) | (1.26) | 1.64 |
2012-38 | 4 | 2.80 | 3.33 | 3.03 | (2.80) | 3.23 | 3.73 | (4.09) |
3x3x3 | ||||||||
2015-09 | 1 | 7.52 | 8.62 | 7.99 | (7.52) | (11.28) | 9.07 | 8.81 |
2012-38 | 4 | 10.22 | 12.09 | (12.94) | 11.50 | (10.22) | 12.03 | 12.74 |
4x4x4 | ||||||||
2012-38 | 4 | 47.72 | 51.78 | 51.61 | (47.72) | 50.69 | 53.05 | (53.37) |
2012-15 | 14 | 56.84 | 1:02.37 | (1:09.86) | (56.84) | 57.83 | 1:00.76 | 1:08.52 |
2x2x2 blindfolded | ||||||||
2015-09 | 1 | 5.68 | DNF | 5.68 | 6.89 | DNF | ||
3x3x3 one-handed | ||||||||
2015-09 | 1 | 13.47 | 15.34 | 14.49 | 14.35 | (17.83) | 17.17 | (13.47) |
3x3x3 Fewest moves | ||||||||
2024-37 | 12 | 22 | DNF | 22 | DNS | DNS | ||
2024-33 | 15 | 20 | DNF1 was nice, 2 was an amazing scramble but i couldn't convert a 22 optimal 9+4 (i also didn't check the 2 move eo's closely enough, one of them has at least a findable 20), 3 was also nice but unlucky finish | 20 | DNF | 20 | ||
2024-19 | 1 | 20 | 21.00~ This is more or less my first mean using new NISS prediction strategies for DR triggers
1. Kinda just a bad attempt, got stuck on some 9+2's which were 22 optimal with 4q but very very hard to find 2. Optimal from DR 3. Sort of got lucky with premove abuse (didn't check that many EO's with it, but I found the promising 8C8E in 6 this way which was quite lucky) | 23 | 20 | 20 | ||
2024-13 | 5 | 23 | DNF | 23 | DNF | DNS | ||
2024-11 | 1 | 21 | 22.00Missed optimal by a total of 2 moves from the stuff I was working with (one move on each of the first two attempts) | 22 | 23 | 21 | ||
2024-05 | 1 | 21 | 21.671. Maybe the worst 2 move EO scramble with more than one <=4 bad axis I've ever seen lol. Got lucky with a 5 move NISS EO on a 4 bad axis
2. Decentish scramble but didn't really get lucky with anything + semi bad time management at the start. I found this DR late which is 20 optimal using 4q instead of 2q: B U L U (U R L2 U2 B2 U). Not the easiest to find, but I do feel finding this start earlier in the attempt would have at least saved me a move or two 3. Slightly worse than average scramble maybe? Good solution though (7C8E practice is already paying off with this solve and also #1, neither of which I would have found even a month ago!) | 21 | 23 | 21 | ||
2024-04 | 14 | 21 | DNF | 21 | DNS | DNS | ||
2023-47 | 1 | 20 | 20.67 | 20 | 22 | 20 | ||
2023-45 | 1 | 19 | 21.00 | 22 | 19 | 22 | ||
2023-44 | 1 | 21 | 21.67Not bad. 1st attempt I missed some promising stuff by not finding a certain DR until late but #2 and #3 were strong attempts | 23 | 21 | 21 | ||
2023-43 | 1 | 19 | 21.331. I missed an easy 21 from this other DR (I found the HTR needed for optimal :((( )
(L' B' D' L) F' L2 U2 F' L 2. Just a really bad attempt but I didn't get completely punished for it. Had motivation issues early in the attempt, got fixated on a 9+3 only to find different 9 move DR's later. Didn't even check 4 of my 4 move EO's which is extremely bad practice 3. Insane scramble with too much to check but no complaints (NISSY output seems to indicate that none of the 18 optimals are findable with DR, though at least 2 use 4 move non NISS EO's) | 23 | 22 | 19 | ||
2023-42 | 1 | 20 | 21.00 | 21 | 20 | 22 | ||
2023-38 | 12 | 21 | DNF | DNF | 21 | 22 | ||
2023-37 | 1 | 20 | 21.67 | 20 | 23 | 22 | ||
2023-36 | 9 | 19 | DNF | 22 | 19 | DNF | ||
2023-29 | 1 | 20 | 22.33[mod: Entered these for week 29 even though they were submitted for week 40. This was because of my mistake posting the wrong scrambles for the week in the thread. Originally I was going to put in fake solutions to make it work for week 40, since the mistake was mine, but eventually decided a better solution was simply to count this as a legitimate late entry for week 29, since that will lead to less confusion.] | 20 | 23 | 24 | ||
2023-25 | 2 | 20 | 22.001. 44 EO's checked, NISSed for 11 RZP's that were 4 or less moves, as well as 4 EO's which were less than 3 moves. Missed an easier 20 from this DR - (B D' F' D' R2 U D2 R)
2. 50 EO's checked, NISSed for 12 RZP's that were 4 or less moves, as well as 5 EO's which were less than 4 moves. Got optimal from all of the stuff I found 3. 32 EO's checked, only NISSed for 3 and a half of my 4 move EO's and RZP in 6 3 times (all were 3C2E). I had 22 to slice from this DR set which I completely forgot about which would have given a better safety I think (when I briefly checked it it seemed like 24 at best but would've still been better) - (D' F' L' U' R) L2 F R' U2 D2 L'. Really bad scramble but also a bad attempt from me | 20 | 21 | 25 | ||
2023-23 | 1 | 22 | 22.67Weird set of scrambles, so I feel like 22.67 isn't a terrible result. I'm sure there's much better than a 22 somewhere on the first scramble (didn't have enough time to check 5 of my 4 move EO's or NISS for very much RZP in 5) | 22 | 23 | 23 | ||
2023-17 | 1 | 20 | 21.00IMO it would be a lot nicer if it was possible to copy paste the scramble and to also display an image of the scramble when you start the timer. Having to manually re-type the scramble for the purpose of generating an image, as well as doing post analysis in NISSY is really annoying
I'd be more interested in doing the FMC weekly if this were changed in some way | 20 | 22 | 21 | ||
2022-27 | 2 | 23 | 23.67Missed optimal by 1 move off my first solves DR due to not checking an S2 insertion during my HTR on inverse
2nd was optimal for the DR 3rd I missed optimal by 2 moves, didn't think to do this for some reason... (B2 L' U2 L) // HTR (I found this) (F2 U2 L2 U2 L2 F2 D2 // Done for a 21 (I think I found F2 but not the following moves :( ) | 25 | 23 | 23 | ||
2022-22 | 3 | 23 | 24.67Missed optimal on #1 by a move from not knowing R B2 U2 L U2 L' B2 U2 R' U2
Missed optimal on #2 by a move from missing a 4 move HTR after my DR with the R' replaced with R #3 was just a bad attempt. I found this DR early and the optimal solution is very findable, but I didn't spend nearly enough time checking it :( (R' L F' L) // EO (B L2 B2 L2 D' U2 F) // DR (what I found) (D) F2 B2 D L2 F2 U // HTR L2 F2 U2 R2 B2 // Done Could be a 22.33 mean under ideal circumstances, or at least a 24.00 just from better finishes on the first two alone :/ | 23 | 23 | 28 | ||
2022-16 | 4 | 26 | DNF | 26 | DNF | 26 | ||
2020-26 | 4 | 21 | DNF | 21 | 30 | DNF | ||
2020-25 | 6 | 22 | DNF | 31 | 22 | DNF | ||
2020-24 | 3 | 23 | 25.00 | 23 | 26 | 26 | ||
2020-23 | 4 | 24 | 28.00 | 29 | 24 | 31 | ||
2016-24 | 2 | 26 | 26 | |||||
2015-11 | 1 | 25 | 25 | |||||
2015-09 | 4 | 31 | 31 | |||||
2015-08 | 3 | 27 | 27 | |||||
2014-46 | 1 | 25 | 25 | |||||
2014-42 | 4 | 31 | 31 | |||||
2014-41 | 3 | 29 | 29 | |||||
2014-40 | 2 | 30 | 30 | |||||
2014-39 | 3 | 30 | 30 | |||||
2012-38 | 4 | 33 | 33 | |||||
Pyraminx | ||||||||
2015-09 | 2 | 3.94 | 4.80 | 5.07 | 4.95 | 4.39 | (3.94) | (5.37) |
Square-1 | ||||||||
2015-09 | 2 | 15.90 | 18.09 | 18.79 | (21.18) | 16.90 | 18.57 | (15.90) |
Skewb | ||||||||
2015-09 | 2 | 3.43 | 3.73 | (3.43) | 4.01 | 3.75 | (4.70) | 3.44 |