User talk:UserWiki

From Speedsolving.com Wiki

Unnecessary edits

Could you please stop performing unnecessary edits such as resetting the Main Page back to its old form, adding longer V perms and Z perms and telling people not to ban you? These edits aren't needed and don't help to improve the wiki in any way. If you continue with this, we will have to ban you because of vandalism. - RedstoneTim (talk) 13:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

You are performing vandalism. Your reverts are unnecessary. UserWiki (talk) 13:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
I've reverted your edits because they either clutter the wiki unnecessarily or do not make sense at all. For example:
  • Your Z perm edit is unnecessary because the algorithm is already on the page, except that you've moved the AUF to the start. Since this "AUF Fronting", as you've called it, is possible to do for all Z perm algorithms, you have two options: list all algorithms twice but with AUF at the start/end or only list one AUF. I consider the last option to be by far the best since "AUF Fronting" is quite obvious, the algorithm list isn't too long and it makes it easier to maintain the pages if a new algorithm doesn't need to be added twice.
  • Your edit of the General Disclaimer which added that your account is not allowed to be banned is not justified. Firstly, normal users are not able to ban anyone and secondly, the admins decide who should be banned, you don't.
  • Your V perm edit which you back up with the reason that "this V-perm is useful for memorization because it contains the F-perm and in turn the T-perm" shouldn't be on this wiki. The algorithm is obviously not as good as the others for speedsolving, so it shouldn't be the first to be shown. It is also not a valid reason to put an algorithm there because it's "easy to learn" or contains other algorithms because there are thousands of bad setups to other algs that could be put there, but it just clutters everything.
  • The Main Page edit is also not any better than the normal page in terms of layout. At least I do not see anything wrong with the normal layout on my phone. If there really was a big issue with layout, please do not just revert back to the old versions but start a discussion on the talk page so people can working on fixing the current page.
If you keep on creating edits like these, telling admins that they are "performing vandalism" and in general do not listen to the admins, you will be blocked. - RedstoneTim (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)