I think the notation page should mention only basic notation ideas (like UDRBLF) and like to pages like "3x3x3 notation," "WCA notation," etc.
- Yes, that's good, else the page will be wery hard to overview. -- Kenneth 06:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Definition for E
As it was, it was inconsistent. I changed it so that "relative to you", "following D", and the picture were all consistent. However, it strikes me that the original "left relative to you" (i.e., following U) would have been the more obvious way to define it. Given the previous inconsistency, it strikes me that the picture could be wrong, and that "following U" was what really had been intended. Is there a way to resolve this for certain? DrHow (talk) 20:24, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
I added a section for Swiss Notation. I support the following:
- Splitting the page into separate articles for each flavour of notation.
- Splitting the image into separate images for each section, and floating them to the right.
- Adding system-wide CSS to improve and standardize the appearance of tables.
Perhaps I'll fix these some day.