Talk:Knock-Off Policy
From Speedsolving.com Wiki
If consensus can be found then it should be written here in plain English.
To start the ball rolling I'd like to put down a few statements of intent and items for consideration. Let me know if I'm way off track here: -
- Everybody loves getting new puzzles - let's not quash that spirit of excitement
- People must be free to make an informed choice
- Nobody likes being told they are stealing, being immoral, etc. Countless forum threads have illustrated that accusations just cause arguments
- People live in different parts of the world with differing social and financial circumstances - goods may be more or less available, or even illegal to obtain!
- I'd prefer to stop short of a ban on linking to vendors that do offer or have in the past offered knock-offs (and believe it or not, that would include Mefferts.com and cube4you!) -- I wouldn't want to somehow criminalise what has always been normal speedsolving.com forum discussion
- Let's try to be civil :)
--Msemtd 17:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
The main puzzles
We need to clear up a lot of misguided recurring puzzle "I.P." commentary: -
- DIY 3x3x3 cubes are NOT KNOCK OFFS!!!! We must express this along with the appropriate evidence
- Only VERDES Innovations S.A. may produce puzzles with the V-Cube mechanisms - AND THAT IS WORLDWIDE WITH NO EXCEPTIONS!!!
- Eastsheen 2x2x2, 4x4x4, 5x5x5: guidance needed?
- MF8 megaminxes are fine - in fact mefferts.com sells these in place of their originals
- QJ 4x4x4 puzzles are not knock-off Meffert's 4x4s!
- the Void Cube and Floppy Cube, designed by Katsuhiko Okamoto and distributed by Gentosha Education Inc -- puzzle fans in the USA and Europe need advice on how to obtain the genuine puzzles for a reasonable price.
More thoughts: -
- the actual legal rights of puzzle designers differ from the "moral rights" to be rewarded for their hard work and innovation
- never forget that patent laws differ worldwide, are variously enforced, overlooked, or considered unimportant by companies and individuals
- patents expire and are often just plain ignored
- let's not forget that some of the Chinese plastics factories are finally bringing some amazing puzzles to mass market that would have otherwise not made it out of the prototype stage
- puzzle designers have in the past been, and will probably continue to be both exploited by and/or well rewarded by manufacturers for their various puzzle designs. We should cite puzzle designers' own comments on twistypuzzles, their own websites, etc.
- we should put emphasis on the positives: successes to date by designers/distributors - we should interview some key people: Tony Fisher and Uwe Meffert would be ideal!
--Msemtd 18:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
