Category talk:Notable Cubers

Untitled

The point of having this category is that you collect all the notable cubers here, and that all the people in the subcategories, such as , is also a notable cuber. There are no Notable Speedcuber that ISN'T a notable cuber, which means that there is NO reason to put people in both categories. Is there any easy way to correct this? Sakarie 17:13, 16 February 2011 (EST)

But there are notable cubers that are not speedcubers, like Rubik himself, the first one ever to solve a cube (that is if we ignore Börje, he was most likley lying about his 1963 solve :P ). // Kenneth 05:58, 17 February 2011 (EST)

Yes, but that wasn't what I said. All the notable cubers that aren't speedcubers can go into the "Notable Cubers" but it shouldn't be the other way around. Sakarie 10:33, 17 February 2011 (EST)

Ah, I suspected I was confused, as usally, but posted anyway :P // Kenneth 12:51, 17 February 2011 (EST)