Difference between revisions of "User talk:Parke187"
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
I know for sure, because I know how probability works. "He checked" doesn't mean much. If you want, you can go make a poll on CF to get "general consensus". [[User:Dancing jules|Dancing jules]] ([[User talk:Dancing jules|talk]]) 20:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC) | I know for sure, because I know how probability works. "He checked" doesn't mean much. If you want, you can go make a poll on CF to get "general consensus". [[User:Dancing jules|Dancing jules]] ([[User talk:Dancing jules|talk]]) 20:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Probability doesn't have a set pattern, it's random. The fact that he would get this scramble is unlikely, but tymon isn't someone who would fake times. And asking CF would be a horrible idea, people in there are pretty dumb. |
Revision as of 20:58, 24 September 2019
Tymon Kolasinski 4x4
Hello, the general consensus seems to be that this was not done on a legit 4x4 scramble and therefore should not count as 4x4 UWR. I am going to remove that from the UWR list.
ok then ill add it back
Why? It is not a legit UWR. Don't go editing back and forth, telly me why!
You don't know for sure that its not legit, so don't just say it isnt.
I know for sure, because I know how probability works. "He checked" doesn't mean much. If you want, you can go make a poll on CF to get "general consensus". Dancing jules (talk) 20:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Probability doesn't have a set pattern, it's random. The fact that he would get this scramble is unlikely, but tymon isn't someone who would fake times. And asking CF would be a horrible idea, people in there are pretty dumb.