Difference between revisions of "Talk:VDW method"
(→Forgiveness for vandalism: new section) |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Forgiveness for vandalism == | == Forgiveness for vandalism == | ||
− | FYI | + | *FYI |
− | I was viewing the page as I do for every method to try and understand it. When I had gone to restroom my brother (who was actually adamant about changing the method to my method) locked me in the restroom for sometime and changed everything. I didn't know everything about the VDW method I changed back everything that I saw related to me (My name, date of proposal). | + | *I was viewing the page as I do for every method to try and understand it. When I had gone to restroom my brother (who was actually adamant about changing the method to my method) locked me in the restroom for sometime and changed everything. I didn't know everything about the VDW method I changed back everything that I saw related to me (My name, date of proposal). |
I apologise for this action of my brother and I promise I will not allow the same to happen again. | I apologise for this action of my brother and I promise I will not allow the same to happen again. | ||
− | Yours sincerely, | + | *Yours sincerely, |
− | V Sundararajan | + | *V Sundararajan (Jb perm) |
Revision as of 01:47, 11 September 2021
I think a brief name/description should be added as that will help people who just glance over to work stuff out. -Shadowslice
I think that would be helpful if you would like to do that since you had the idea then go right ahead.
Random note: Just please don't tamper with the steps too much if you decide to do that for some reason or at least let me know. -VDW1014
The problem with the page is that the step explanations are far too long, making them hard to understand. I am trying to shorten some of the steps but I can't even understand what is supposed to be done during some of them because of them being so long. -Bryce Springfield
I know they are lengthy... I'll try to simplify them too. It's just that I have all of these concepts and details in my head that make perfect sense, so getting them across easily is hard. I will try to shorten them too. -Alex
Also, in step five, for LSE, the points made for step five describe what LSE already is, so I will be removing them. I find them to be a tad bit redundant. -Alex
It seems like this method is really similar to three other methods, so merging them into one article might be a good idea (see https://www.speedsolving.com/wiki/index.php/Talk:TICT#Three_very_similar_methods) - RedstoneTim (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Vandalism
It seems like this page has been vandalized by User:Jb perm. Specifically, the year of creation has been changed to 2021, everything from the Skis method passage onwards was deleted and the proposers were removed or changed to a certain "V Sundararajan", which I would assume to be the same person as User:Jb perm judging by their other edits. They do not seem to be a bot (see the 2 holes page which they created) and no other acts of vandalism have been committed by them, so I am not going to ban them, at least not now.
I have removed the vandalism but will keep this section here in order to allow User:Jb perm to explain their reasoning for the edits. - RedstoneTim (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Forgiveness for vandalism
- FYI
- I was viewing the page as I do for every method to try and understand it. When I had gone to restroom my brother (who was actually adamant about changing the method to my method) locked me in the restroom for sometime and changed everything. I didn't know everything about the VDW method I changed back everything that I saw related to me (My name, date of proposal).
I apologise for this action of my brother and I promise I will not allow the same to happen again.
- Yours sincerely,
- V Sundararajan (Jb perm)