Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Unofficial World Records"

From Speedsolving.com Wiki
(That was their goal to get on this page, so I think this is a bad idea to show their fake times. I can say my 3x3 single is 1.5 and I would be the first here... Conspicuous how only very young kids "have" these singles and Max Park's single is not here...)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Changing the titles of some of the tables. --[[User:Owen|Owen]] 11:36, 17 December 2011 (EST)
 
Changing the titles of some of the tables. --[[User:Owen|Owen]] 11:36, 17 December 2011 (EST)
  
== Phone cubes ==
+
== Phone cubes ==  
  
 
Randomno thinks MagicPuzzlePro is for Windows, when it's actually for Android. [[User:Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski|Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 
Randomno thinks MagicPuzzlePro is for Windows, when it's actually for Android. [[User:Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski|Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 05:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:21, 3 October 2019

Changing the titles of some of the tables. --Owen 11:36, 17 December 2011 (EST)

Phone cubes

Randomno thinks MagicPuzzlePro is for Windows, when it's actually for Android. Sock2OfPiotrGrochowski (talk) 05:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Tymon Kolasinski's 4x4 time

The general consensus seems to be that Tymon Kolasinski accidentally executed a 3bld scramble on a 4x4. "L2 R2 D2 U' B2 D2 L2 F2 L2 F2 D R2 L' B' U' B' L2 U2 F2 L2 R2 Rw2 Uw'" is not a scramble that cstimer.net would ever give out for 4x4. Please do not add Tymon's 10.86 as a 4x4 UWR. If you wish to discuss this, please do so here and not in the article. Dancing jules (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

LMFAO who said he used a 3bld scramble, he said he checked it and it was legit. Don't say "the general consensus seems to be", when its just your opinion, im gonna add this time back until you stop.

Have you seen the facebook discussion? It's impossible. He may be lying, he may be in denial, but it IS IMPOSSIBLE! Dancing jules (talk) 20:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

I have seen the discussion. Again, he literally checked it. It isn't impossible.

Although the creator of cstimer did say it is technically possible tomgive out the scramble, I think removing the column was the best course of action, just like 3x3 single years ago. Galaxy

Should 3x3 UWR be tracked?

In my opinion, no. It's too controversial, like 2x2 single and ao5. There have been 8 sub-2.8 times that have been claimed by various people, most of these almost definitely fake, but me and the majority of people agree that the 2.82 is legit. Just removing it is the best course of action to stop the controversy. Now, I'm not saying the 2.88 is fake, not at all! If there's anyone you can trust, it's probably Max, just like nobody contests Patrick's 2.99: just that there is too much controversy, for the millionth time! For those who are curious, here are those mentioned sub-2.88 times.

Kim Roger Hoyland Larsen 2.82, Etienne Guay 2.82, Sameer Aggarwal 2.78, Vyacheslav Zhuravsky 2.72, Uranium Cuber 2.71, Etienne Guay 2.65, Etienne Guay 2.62, Anrii Simonov 2.59, andreicuber123 2.36

Galaxy