Difference between revisions of "TEG-D"
From Speedsolving.com Wiki
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
==Example solves== | ==Example solves== | ||
− | # | + | #F U' R2 F2 U2 R' F' U2 F' |
− | #x2 y' R' U' R' (Layer) | + | #*x2 y' R' U' R' (Layer) U' F U2 R' U' F R2 U2 R' F (Alg) U (AUF) |
− | + | #R U2 R' F R' F U2 R' U' | |
− | + | #*z U2 F (Layer) U' F' R' U' R' U2 R' F R2 (Alg) U' (AUF) | |
− | + | #F R2 F U' R F2 U R' U' | |
− | # | + | #*x' y' R' (Cancelling moves instead of doing R for layer, because the alg starts with R2) F U' F R' F2 R U R' F (Alg) U2 (AUF) |
− | #z U2 F (Layer) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | # | ||
− | #x' y' R' (Cancelling moves instead of doing R for layer, because the alg starts with R2) F U' F R' F2 R U R' F (Alg) | ||
− | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== |
Revision as of 12:09, 18 August 2017
|
Steps
- Solve a EG-2 layer (one corner can be twisted in place)
- Solve the rest
Pros
- Can easily be 1-looked in almost all cases fairly easily.
- Lots of cancellations can be formed between the layer and the algorithm
- Building an EG-2 layer with a twisted corner is much shorter than building a full layer
- Can have ridiculously easy solves
Cons
- It is not generally recommended to use TEG-2 as a stand alone method
- Beginners may find it difficult to 1-look solves and take advantage of the cancellations
- Approximately 2 Times more algorithms than CLL, EG-1 or EG-2
Example solves
- F U' R2 F2 U2 R' F' U2 F'
- x2 y' R' U' R' (Layer) U' F U2 R' U' F R2 U2 R' F (Alg) U (AUF)
- R U2 R' F R' F U2 R' U'
- z U2 F (Layer) U' F' R' U' R' U2 R' F R2 (Alg) U' (AUF)
- F R2 F U' R F2 U R' U'
- x' y' R' (Cancelling moves instead of doing R for layer, because the alg starts with R2) F U' F R' F2 R U R' F (Alg) U2 (AUF)