Difference between revisions of "R3-T"

From Speedsolving.com Wiki
Line 37: Line 37:
  
  
 +
After that, solve the 2 remaining E-edges to complete the E-slice.
  
  
3)'''CO'''-Corner orientation(a.k.a. CO) can be solved using 1-2 [[OCLL]] algs - 7 algs.
+
 
 +
 
 +
3)'''CO'''-Corner orientation(CO) can be solved using 1-2 [[OCLL]] algs - 7 algs.
 
(orient the corners stuck in the D layer by doing an R2 first)
 
(orient the corners stuck in the D layer by doing an R2 first)
 +
  
 
This can also be done by inserting the last one with TSLE.
 
This can also be done by inserting the last one with TSLE.
(or something else)
+
(or use another subset that does CO)
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
4)'''Spam F2L'''- F2L is finished with mainly R2,U moves.(or L2,U if it's on the left etc.)
 +
Basically pair the last 2 corners with the last cross edge to make the 1x1x3 that goes in the first layer.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
5)'''PLL'''- Permute the pieces of the last layer - 21 algs.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Pros==
 +
*EO edge can be planned in inspection and the transition between steps is quick.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*The E-slice is solved efficiently and lookahead for E-slice edges is easy.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*The remainder of F2L can be solved only using R2 and U moves allowing the user to spam TPS easily.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*Alg count is significantly lesser than Full [[CFOP]] as you use only OCLL's to orient corners.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
 
 +
==Cons==
 +
*EO edge will take time to get used to.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*You have to do 2 [[OCLL]]'s half of the time to orient the corners
 +
e.g. Sune,R2,Sune
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*Finishing F2L with R2 and U might not be efficient at times.
  
  
 +
*R2's can be bad for OH.
  
R3-Ta is a different way of getting to the [[Spam F2L]] step.
 
  
 
{{Method Infobox
 
{{Method Infobox
Line 63: Line 106:
 
* [[one-handed solving]]
 
* [[one-handed solving]]
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 +
R3-Ta is a different way of getting to the [[Spam F2L]] step.
 +
  
 
{{Method Header
 
{{Method Header
 
|listofsteps=[[1x2x3 block]] -> [[E-slice]] -> [[EO+CO]] -> [[Spam F2L]](remainder) -> [[PLL]]
 
|listofsteps=[[1x2x3 block]] -> [[E-slice]] -> [[EO+CO]] -> [[Spam F2L]](remainder) -> [[PLL]]
 
|description= R3-T is a hybrid method that does corner orientation before finishing F2L.
 
|description= R3-T is a hybrid method that does corner orientation before finishing F2L.
==Steps==
+
}}
  
  
 +
==Steps==
 
1)'''1x2x3 block'''(FB)  - Solve a 1x2x3 block antwhere on the cube, it will be treated as if it's in the D layer.
 
1)'''1x2x3 block'''(FB)  - Solve a 1x2x3 block antwhere on the cube, it will be treated as if it's in the D layer.
  
Line 117: Line 164:
  
 
5)'''PLL''' - Permute the pieces of the last layer - 21 algs.
 
5)'''PLL''' - Permute the pieces of the last layer - 21 algs.
 +
 +
  
 
==Pros==
 
==Pros==
Line 132: Line 181:
  
 
*EO can be recognized quickly (maximum bad edges - 4)
 
*EO can be recognized quickly (maximum bad edges - 4)
 +
 +
  
 
==Cons==
 
==Cons==
 
*The 1x2x3 is hard to optimize.
 
*The 1x2x3 is hard to optimize.
 
 
*Recognizing EO in the middle of the solve(even though the maximum amount of misoriented edges is 4) will take some time
 
  
  
Line 147: Line 195:
  
  
*R2's can be bad for OH
+
*R2's can be bad for OH.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*Recognizing EO in the middle of the solve(even though the maximum amount of misoriented edges is 4) will take some time.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
*You have to do a z rotation after finishing the E-slice if you do it the Quadrangular Francisco way(position the 1x2x3 on the left).
 +
 
 +
 
  
  
*You have to do a z rotation after finishing the E-slice if you do it the Quadrangular Francisco way(position the 1x2x3 on the left.)
 
  
 
==Tips==
 
==Tips==

Revision as of 15:07, 14 March 2018

R3-T method
Information about the method
Proposer(s): Terence Tan
Proposed: 2018
Alt Names: R3T/Reduction3-T/Redux3-T
Variants: R3T-4c/invisible
No. Steps: 5+
No. Algs: 28+
Avg Moves: ~57
Purpose(s):


R3-T(bad name,I know) is basically a weird Petrus and Hexagonal Francisco variant. It solves the E-slice in a similar way to Quadrangular Francisco, (a method created by Alex Yang) which is a variant of Hexagonal Francisco, (a method by Andrew Nathenson) which is a variant of Triangular Francisco.

The E-Slice is solved efficiently and F2L is finished off in an unusual way.


Scramble 04.jpg

Scrambled cube -> EO edge -> pseudo 1x2x3+E-slice -> CO -> Spam F2L(remainder) -> PLL -> Solved cube


R3-T is a hybrid method that does corner orientation before finishing F2L.

Mini maru.jpg

Steps

1)EO edge -Do EO and solve 2 E-slice edges, it can be the FL and BL or FR and BR edges.



2)Pseudo 1x2x3+E-slice-Using the empty face, solve a 1x2x3 block in the D layer.


You can start off by solving 2 opposite D layer edges, then the 1x1x3 block that goes with it.


After that, solve the 2 remaining E-edges to complete the E-slice.



3)CO-Corner orientation(CO) can be solved using 1-2 OCLL algs - 7 algs. (orient the corners stuck in the D layer by doing an R2 first)


This can also be done by inserting the last one with TSLE. (or use another subset that does CO)



4)Spam F2L- F2L is finished with mainly R2,U moves.(or L2,U if it's on the left etc.) Basically pair the last 2 corners with the last cross edge to make the 1x1x3 that goes in the first layer.



5)PLL- Permute the pieces of the last layer - 21 algs.


Pros

  • EO edge can be planned in inspection and the transition between steps is quick.


  • The E-slice is solved efficiently and lookahead for E-slice edges is easy.


  • The remainder of F2L can be solved only using R2 and U moves allowing the user to spam TPS easily.


  • Alg count is significantly lesser than Full CFOP as you use only OCLL's to orient corners.


Cons

  • EO edge will take time to get used to.


  • You have to do 2 OCLL's half of the time to orient the corners

e.g. Sune,R2,Sune


  • Finishing F2L with R2 and U might not be efficient at times.


  • R2's can be bad for OH.


R3-Ta method
Information about the method
Proposer(s): Terence Tan
Proposed: 2018
Alt Names: R3Ta/Reduction3-Ta/Redux3-Ta
Variants: R3Ta-4c/invisible
No. Steps: 5+
No. Algs: 28+
Avg Moves: ~57
Purpose(s):


R3-Ta is a different way of getting to the Spam F2L step.


Scramble 04.jpg

Scrambled cube -> 1x2x3 block -> E-slice -> EO+CO -> Spam F2L(remainder) -> PLL -> Solved cube


R3-T is a hybrid method that does corner orientation before finishing F2L.

Mini maru.jpg


Steps

1)1x2x3 block(FB) - Solve a 1x2x3 block antwhere on the cube, it will be treated as if it's in the D layer.


  • For beginners, you can treat it as 3 cross pieces and 2 corners.



2)E-slice - solve the E-slice with the empty face.This can be done very efficiently. The E-slice does not have to line up


  • you can position the 1x2x3 on the left(like Roux's FB)in this step if you

want.



3)EO+CO - you solve edge-orientation and corner-orientation.(not necessarily in that order)


  • Because the E-slice is already solved, there can only be 0, 2 or 4 misoriented edges.


4 misoriented edges can be solved as an arrow (like in LSE) e.g. (D') M'U M


2 misoriented edges can be solved using an OLL alg.(you can influence corner orientation in this step.)


  • CO can be solved using 1-2 OCLL algs - 7 algs.

(orient the corners stuck in the D layer by doing an R2 first)

This can also be done by solving only 3 E-edges and insert the last one with TSLE.



4)Spam F2L - F2L is finished with mainly R2,U moves.(or L2,U if it's on the left etc.) Basically pair the last 2 corners with the last cross edge to make the 1x1x3 that goes in the first layer.



5)PLL - Permute the pieces of the last layer - 21 algs.


Pros

  • FB can be planned in inspection and the transition between steps is fairly quick.


  • The E-slice is solved efficiently and lookahead for E-slice edges is easy.


  • The remainder of F2L can be solved only using R2 and U moves allowing the user to spam TPS easily.


  • Alg count is significantly lesser than Full CFOP as you use only OCLL's to orient corners.


  • EO can be recognized quickly (maximum bad edges - 4)


Cons

  • The 1x2x3 is hard to optimize.


  • You have to do 2 OCLL's half of the time to orient the corners

e.g. Sune,R2,Sune


  • Finishing F2L with R2 and U might not be efficient at times.


  • R2's can be bad for OH.


  • Recognizing EO in the middle of the solve(even though the maximum amount of misoriented edges is 4) will take some time.


  • You have to do a z rotation after finishing the E-slice if you do it the Quadrangular Francisco way(position the 1x2x3 on the left).



Tips

  • FB positioning

(Assuming you keep the FB on the D layer)You can either position the FB

In the back - Insert E-edges like how you would in Hexagonal Francisco, R (U) R', L' (U) L, r (U) r' and l' (U) l

On the side - (left or right)


  • Misaligned E-slice

You don't have to align the E-slice with the block after solving the E-slice



Overview

I don't think it's comparable with bigger methods like CFOP, ROUX, ZZ and Petrus, but it's definitely fun to use

F2L is solved in steps, while solving edge-orientation and corner-orientation.PLL is applied right after finishing F2L for a quick finish.