Difference between revisions of "Ortega Method"

From Speedsolving.com Wiki
(Removed from 2x2x2 category (is already under 2x2x2 methods) and added to beginner methods)
(25 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|name=Ortega
 
|name=Ortega
 
|image=Ortega.gif
 
|image=Ortega.gif
|proposers=<br/> [[Victor Ortega]] <br/> [[Josef Jelinek]]
+
|proposers=[[Jeffrey Varasano]] <br/> [[Victor Ortega]] <br/> [[Josef Jelinek]]
 
|year=1981, later reintroduced in 2000
 
|year=1981, later reintroduced in 2000
|anames=Ortega
+
|anames=Varasano
 
|variants
 
|variants
|steps=3 (Solve D face, Solve U face, [[PBL]])
+
|steps=3 (Solve D face, [[OLL]], [[PBL]])
 
|algs=11 to 12
 
|algs=11 to 12
|moves=25-30
+
|moves=20
 
|purpose=<sup></sup>
 
|purpose=<sup></sup>
 
* [[Speedsolving]]
 
* [[Speedsolving]]
 
}}
 
}}
  
The '''Varasano Method''', formerly known as the '''Ortega Method''', is a 2x2 and 3x3 [[speedsolving]] method. It was originally named after [[Victor Ortega]] from 2000 to 2015 before the name was replaced and renamed after It is mostly popular today for being an intermediate 2x2 solving method.
+
The '''Ortega Method''', also known as the '''Varasano Method''', is a 2x2 and 3x3 [[speedsolving]] method. If used to solve a 3x3 [[shape modification]], extra algorithms may have to be used. It is named after [[Victor Ortega]], and is mostly popular today for being an intermediate 2x2 solving method.
  
  
 
== Naming Dispute ==
 
== Naming Dispute ==
[[Victor Ortega]] is credited for creating the Oretga method. Victor Ortega popularized the method, it was often called the Ortega method. It is similar to a method created by Jeffrey Varasano, but is not the same thing for a few different reasons.
+
[[Victor Ortega]] is often credited for creating the method. While it is true that Victor popularized the method, he cannot be said to have created it, similar to the naming dispute with the [[CFOP]] method. The popularity of the method dates from December 2001 when [[Josef Jelinek]] added Ortega's [[Corners First]] method (as a solution for 3x3x3 cubes) to his website.[https://web.archive.org/web/20011225093221/http://cube.misto.cz/_MAIL_/index.html] (Jelínek himself had already outlined a Corners-first approach comparable to the Ortega Method.[https://web.archive.org/web/20010212015351/http://cube.misto.cz/_MAIL_/corners.html]) His website has always stated that Ortega's method was "based on [[Minh Thai]]'s ''Winning Solution''" (from 1982).[https://web.archive.org/web/20020208013747/http://cube.misto.cz/_MAIL_/cfsm.html] The method got picked-up by 2x2 cubers and became widely known as the Ortega Method.
  
 
+
In 2015 competitive cuber and YouTuber [[Christopher Olson]] researched the creation of the Ortega method. He found an original 3x3 method in a book by [[Jeffrey Varasano]], the 1981 US record holder for the Rubik's cube, explaining how he solved a Rubik's cube in under 45 seconds. His was a Corners-first method similar to the method used by Minh Thai to win the [[World Championship 1982]]. But the method for solving the corners turned out to have the same steps as the "Ortega" method. This led to Chris creating [https://youtu.be/054bInnL8YY a video] to rename the Ortega method to the Varasano method. However, the naming change did not stick and the majority still call it "Ortega", although "Varasano-Ortega" is sometimes used.
Later on in 2015, competitive cuber and YouTube content creator [[Christopher Olson]] did research about the creation of the Ortega method. In a booklet, he had found a 3x3 method originally used by [[Jeffrey Varasano]], the 1981 US national champion for the Rubik's cube, in 1981, explaining how he solved a Rubik's cube in under 45 seconds. His method started off with solving the corners, then the edges, similar to the method used by [[Minh Thai]] to get the former world record single in 1982. But, the method for solving the corners turned out to have the same steps as the "Ortega" method. Victor Ortega even admitted that his method was inspired off of Jeff Varasano's 3x3 method, according to Chris Olson. This led to Chris creating [https://youtu.be/054bInnL8YY a video] to rename the Ortega method to the Ortega method and to explain why the name change is occurring. Though this does not mean that Ortega is the same as Varasano's method. That would be like saying all corner first method's are created by Varanso, which is simply not accurate.
 
  
 
== As a 2x2x2 Method ==
 
== As a 2x2x2 Method ==
  
Using Oretga as a 2x2x2 method first involves solving one [[face]] intuitively; don't worry about solving an entire [[layer]], because the face will be [[permutation|permuted]] later. Second, [[orientation|orient]] the opposite face, either by using the same [[OLL]] algorithms as on 3x3x3 or by using more efficient ones made for 2x2x2 (see below). Finally, you permute both layers at the same time by using [[PBL]]. The last step may sound difficult but there are only 5 possible cases, so it is quick to learn. In total, there are 12 algorithms to learn (11 without reflections).
+
Using Ortega as a 2x2x2 method first involves solving one [[face]] intuitively; don't worry about solving an entire [[layer]], because the face will be [[permutation|permuted]] later. Second, [[orientation|orient]] the opposite face, either by using the same [[OLL]] algorithms as on 3x3x3 or by using more efficient ones made for 2x2x2 (see below). Finally, you permute both layers at the same time by using [[PBL]]. The last step may sound difficult but there are only 5 possible cases, so it is quick to learn. In total, there are 12 algorithms to learn (11 without reflections).
  
 
For the first face, without [[colour neutral]]ity, the average move count in [[HTM]] is a surprisingly low 3.97, and no cases require more than 5 turns. Because of this inspection is just a few seconds, advanced users benefit from that and uses the remaining inspection time to predict the OLL case, or even the whole solve.
 
For the first face, without [[colour neutral]]ity, the average move count in [[HTM]] is a surprisingly low 3.97, and no cases require more than 5 turns. Because of this inspection is just a few seconds, advanced users benefit from that and uses the remaining inspection time to predict the OLL case, or even the whole solve.
Line 31: Line 30:
  
 
== As a 3x3x3 Method ==
 
== As a 3x3x3 Method ==
Using Varasano as a 3x3x3 method involves first solving the [[corner]]s completely, followed by insertion of the D layer [[edge]]s, and 3 of the U-layer edges. The mid-layer edges are then oriented during placement of the final U-layer edge, and finally the mid-layer edges are permuted. @see rubikscube.info link below..
+
Using Ortega as a 3x3x3 method involves first solving the [[corner]]s completely, followed by insertion of the D layer [[edge]]s, and 3 of the U-layer edges. The mid-layer edges are then oriented during placement of the final U-layer edge, and finally the mid-layer edges are permuted. @see rubikscube.info link below..
  
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 42: Line 41:
  
 
== External links ==
 
== External links ==
 +
* [https://youtu.be/054bInnL8YY Why the Ortega method was renamed to the Varasano method]
 
* [http://rubikscube.info/ortega.php rubikscube.info]
 
* [http://rubikscube.info/ortega.php rubikscube.info]
 
* [http://erikku.er.funpic.org/rubik/2x2_ortega.html funpic.org]
 
* [http://erikku.er.funpic.org/rubik/2x2_ortega.html funpic.org]
Line 51: Line 51:
 
* Youtube: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VEtgnL_Ia8 3x3x3 Ortega Video Tutorial]
 
* Youtube: [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VEtgnL_Ia8 3x3x3 Ortega Video Tutorial]
 
* [http://sites.google.com/site/kubbuth/2x2x2/ortega Ortega method in Swedish]
 
* [http://sites.google.com/site/kubbuth/2x2x2/ortega Ortega method in Swedish]
 
+
* [https://www.speedcubingtips.eu/methodes-de-resolution/methode-ortega-2x2x2/ Ortega method in French by speedcubingtips.eu]
  
 
[[Category:2x2x2 methods]]
 
[[Category:2x2x2 methods]]
 
[[Category:2x2x2 beginner methods]]
 
[[Category:2x2x2 beginner methods]]
 +
[[Category:2x2x2 speedsolving methods]]
 
[[Category:3x3x3 methods]]
 
[[Category:3x3x3 methods]]
 
[[Category:3x3x3 speedsolving methods]]
 
[[Category:3x3x3 speedsolving methods]]
 +
[[Category:3x3x3 corners first methods]]

Revision as of 09:13, 17 April 2020

Ortega method
Ortega.gif
Information about the method
Proposer(s): Jeffrey Varasano
Victor Ortega
Josef Jelinek
Proposed: 1981, later reintroduced in 2000
Alt Names: Varasano
Variants: none
No. Steps: 3 (Solve D face, OLL, PBL)
No. Algs: 11 to 12
Avg Moves: 20
Purpose(s):


The Ortega Method, also known as the Varasano Method, is a 2x2 and 3x3 speedsolving method. If used to solve a 3x3 shape modification, extra algorithms may have to be used. It is named after Victor Ortega, and is mostly popular today for being an intermediate 2x2 solving method.


Naming Dispute

Victor Ortega is often credited for creating the method. While it is true that Victor popularized the method, he cannot be said to have created it, similar to the naming dispute with the CFOP method. The popularity of the method dates from December 2001 when Josef Jelinek added Ortega's Corners First method (as a solution for 3x3x3 cubes) to his website.[1] (Jelínek himself had already outlined a Corners-first approach comparable to the Ortega Method.[2]) His website has always stated that Ortega's method was "based on Minh Thai's Winning Solution" (from 1982).[3] The method got picked-up by 2x2 cubers and became widely known as the Ortega Method.

In 2015 competitive cuber and YouTuber Christopher Olson researched the creation of the Ortega method. He found an original 3x3 method in a book by Jeffrey Varasano, the 1981 US record holder for the Rubik's cube, explaining how he solved a Rubik's cube in under 45 seconds. His was a Corners-first method similar to the method used by Minh Thai to win the World Championship 1982. But the method for solving the corners turned out to have the same steps as the "Ortega" method. This led to Chris creating a video to rename the Ortega method to the Varasano method. However, the naming change did not stick and the majority still call it "Ortega", although "Varasano-Ortega" is sometimes used.

As a 2x2x2 Method

Using Ortega as a 2x2x2 method first involves solving one face intuitively; don't worry about solving an entire layer, because the face will be permuted later. Second, orient the opposite face, either by using the same OLL algorithms as on 3x3x3 or by using more efficient ones made for 2x2x2 (see below). Finally, you permute both layers at the same time by using PBL. The last step may sound difficult but there are only 5 possible cases, so it is quick to learn. In total, there are 12 algorithms to learn (11 without reflections).

For the first face, without colour neutrality, the average move count in HTM is a surprisingly low 3.97, and no cases require more than 5 turns. Because of this inspection is just a few seconds, advanced users benefit from that and uses the remaining inspection time to predict the OLL case, or even the whole solve.

The case shown in the picture in the method information box is known as Sune, one of the OLL cases.

As a 3x3x3 Method

Using Ortega as a 3x3x3 method involves first solving the corners completely, followed by insertion of the D layer edges, and 3 of the U-layer edges. The mid-layer edges are then oriented during placement of the final U-layer edge, and finally the mid-layer edges are permuted. @see rubikscube.info link below..

See also

External links