Difference between revisions of "OLS"

From Speedsolving.com Wiki
Line 38: Line 38:
 
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
 
*[https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/threads/ols-vls-hls-algorithms-by-mats-valk-and-rowe-hessler.44642/ The original forum post introducing VLS and HLS]
 
*[https://www.speedsolving.com/forum/threads/ols-vls-hls-algorithms-by-mats-valk-and-rowe-hessler.44642/ The original forum post introducing VLS and HLS]
*[http://rowe.cubing.net/rls/ All of Rowe Nessler's VLS algorithms]
+
*[http://rowe.cubing.net/rls/ All of Rowe Hessler's VLS algorithms]

Revision as of 06:17, 1 June 2016

OLS
[[Image:]]
Information
Proposer(s): Mats Valk, Rowe Hessler, Lucas Winter, and Chester Lian
Proposed: WV: 2005
SV: 2009
The rest of VLS + HLS: 2013
Alt Names:
Variants: VLS, HLS
Subgroup:
No. Algs: 864, including mirrors
Avg Moves:
Purpose(s):


OLS, an acronym for Orientation of the Last Slot, is a last slot method used to skip any OLL case while simultaneously solving the last F2L pair. All OLS cases can be solved using one of the algorithms found in VLS or HLS. If the pair cannot be solved using RUR' or RU'R', it can be intuitively changed to be able to do so. For example, if you were to set up this case (RU'R'URU2R'), the pair can be easily changed to an HLS case by intuitively doing this algorithm (RU2R'U'). This method is quite helpful with decreasing times once the solver gets used to using the algorithms. Some speedsolvers who use this method from time to time include Feliks Zemdegs and Seung Hyuk Nahm.

Learning Approach

As previously stated, OLS is mainly split into two groups: VLS and HLS. These two groups are split into 8 subsets, each, that are based on edge misorientation. The subsets under VLS include WV, UF, UL, UB, UFUL, ULUB, UFUB, and all edges. The subsets under HLS include SV, UF, UL, UR, UFUR, UFUL, ULUR, and all edges. Each of these subsets has 54 algorithms, including mirrors. It is usually recommended to first learn WV, then SV, followed by the rest of VLS, and finally the rest of HLS.

Pros

  • Move count is decreased compared to normally doing the last F2L pair, then OLL.
  • It requires less look ahead, if implemented into solves, compared to doing the last F2L pair and OLL.
  • You'll instantly gain cool kid points and be able to impress your cubing friends

Cons

  • There are a total of 864 algorithms, including mirrors.
  • Because of the first point, this means that if the solver were to learn full OLS, it would likely take at least two and a half years if 1 algorithm was learned per day.

See Also

External Links