Difference between revisions of "NMCLL"
RedstoneTim (talk | contribs) m (Fixed link to Gilles Roux) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | '''NMCLL''' is the name given to the last layer of corners when | + | '''NMCLL''' is the name given to the last layer of corners when one layer is offset by 90 or 180 degrees. It is a subset of [[A2]] and can be used as a 2x2 method in combination with, and using the same algorithms as, [[CLL]]. NMCLL is also used in 3x3 methods, such as [[Roux]], [[ZZ]], and [[Petrus]] when non-matching blocks are built. NMCLL was originally proposed by Gilles Roux for the Roux method and the recognition method was co-developed by James Straughan. |
== Description == | == Description == | ||
| − | During a solve, it isn't initially required that the bottom layer of corners match. In Roux, for example, this gives four options for the second block. These pseudo blocks also have an effect on the last layer. More stickers from the F, B, and D layers can be mixed in. While any recognition can be used, the traditional ways are difficult to use with all non-matching corner types. A recognition method has been developed specifically to solve this problem and works equally well with matching and non-matching corners. All of the same algorithms | + | During a solve, it isn't initially required that the bottom layer of corners match. In Roux, for example, this gives four options for the second block. These pseudo blocks also have an effect on the last layer. More stickers from the F, B, and D layers can be mixed in. While any recognition can be used, the traditional ways are difficult to use with all non-matching corner types. A recognition method has been developed specifically to solve this problem and works equally well with matching and non-matching corners. All of the same algorithms are used, though memorization of two patterns per algorithm is required. The use of this technique reduces the number of moves in the solve, which is especially useful for 2x2. |
== See also == | == See also == | ||
| + | * [[A2]] | ||
* [[CLL]] | * [[CLL]] | ||
* [[NMLL]] | * [[NMLL]] | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* [https://sites.google.com/site/athefre/roux Athefre's Recognition Method] | * [https://sites.google.com/site/athefre/roux Athefre's Recognition Method] | ||
| − | * [http:// | + | * [http://grrroux.free.fr/method/Step_3.html Gilles Roux's CMLL Page] |
| − | |||
[[Category:3x3x3 last layer substeps]] | [[Category:3x3x3 last layer substeps]] | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 19 April 2020
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
NMCLL is the name given to the last layer of corners when one layer is offset by 90 or 180 degrees. It is a subset of A2 and can be used as a 2x2 method in combination with, and using the same algorithms as, CLL. NMCLL is also used in 3x3 methods, such as Roux, ZZ, and Petrus when non-matching blocks are built. NMCLL was originally proposed by Gilles Roux for the Roux method and the recognition method was co-developed by James Straughan.
Description
During a solve, it isn't initially required that the bottom layer of corners match. In Roux, for example, this gives four options for the second block. These pseudo blocks also have an effect on the last layer. More stickers from the F, B, and D layers can be mixed in. While any recognition can be used, the traditional ways are difficult to use with all non-matching corner types. A recognition method has been developed specifically to solve this problem and works equally well with matching and non-matching corners. All of the same algorithms are used, though memorization of two patterns per algorithm is required. The use of this technique reduces the number of moves in the solve, which is especially useful for 2x2.
