Difference between revisions of "Method Neutrality"
From Speedsolving.com Wiki
Just a cuber (talk | contribs) m (Tidy up things a bit) |
Just a cuber (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Pros of Method Neutrality == | == Pros of Method Neutrality == | ||
− | * Method Neutrality sometimes can be | + | * Method Neutrality sometimes can be advantageous, if a scramble has finished or almost finished the first step of the method, or if it has any step finished. |
* For example, one may use CFOP because the cross is finished or they may use ZZ when all of the edges are oriented. | * For example, one may use CFOP because the cross is finished or they may use ZZ when all of the edges are oriented. | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 11 May 2020
The term method neutrality refers to the ability to solve a puzzle with multiple methods in approximately equal times.
Contents
Notable Method Neutral Cubers
Pros of Method Neutrality
- Method Neutrality sometimes can be advantageous, if a scramble has finished or almost finished the first step of the method, or if it has any step finished.
- For example, one may use CFOP because the cross is finished or they may use ZZ when all of the edges are oriented.
Cons of Method Neutrality
- Learning multiple methods and having similar times with all of them is a huge task.
- In inspection, a solver needs to choose which method suits the scramble best in 15 seconds, which can be compared to planning two pairs in inspection.
See Also
|