Difference between revisions of "Briggs"
From Speedsolving.com Wiki
RedstoneTim (talk | contribs) m (Removed invalid category) |
m |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|year=2015 | |year=2015 | ||
|anames= | |anames= | ||
− | |variants= | + | |variants=[[YruRU]] |
|steps= 3 major, 5 minor | |steps= 3 major, 5 minor | ||
|algs= 54 (full), <10 min | |algs= 54 (full), <10 min | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
+ | *[[YruRU]] | ||
*[[NCPB 2.0]] | *[[NCPB 2.0]] | ||
*[[ZZ|ZZ-Porky]] | *[[ZZ|ZZ-Porky]] |
Revision as of 19:35, 15 May 2020
|
The original CP (corner permutation) First method, it was created by Shadowslice based off Jaap's work on corner permutation and ZZ-Porky. It is not a really practical method and was more of a proof of concept as the CP first was an entirely new concept.
Contents
Steps
- Solve CP and a 1x1x3 in DP using a 3-cycle to help with planning FB
- Extend to a 1x2x3 using <R,r,M,U,u>
- Extend to a 2x2x3+EO using the same moves
- Finish F2L using <R,U>
- 2GLL
Pros
- 84 alg 1LLL is reasonably good.
- <R,r,U,M> is very ergonomic.
- A fair amount can be planned in inspection.
Cons
- Lookahead is poor.
- CP can be a big drain in inspection
- EO+ blockbuilding at the same time is hard
- CP can take a quite a few moves.
- It can take a while to get used to CP planning.
See Also
- YruRU
- NCPB 2.0
- ZZ-Porky
- B2 (Shadowslice's improved second variant)
- Jaap's page on CP which inspired the method
- Original method proposal