• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

What is the best 3x3 method?

What is the best 3x3 method?

  • Cfop

    Votes: 18 52.9%
  • Roux

    Votes: 12 35.3%
  • Zz

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Petrus

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Other (explain)

    Votes: 3 8.8%

  • Total voters
    34
I can't believe Petrus is even on these lists anymore. There are so many newer faster & more modern alternative methods than Petrus.
 
If it’s for speedsolving, definitely CFOP. However; for FMC and other efficiency focused aspects of cubing, many people use Petrus or ZZ. Roux is a combination of both, having a lower move count than CFOP, but is usually faster than Petrus or ZZ.
 
Roux and CFOP are the best methods based on their ease of learning, predictable recognition, and their different but nonetheless major efficiencies. Roux shaves off the actual move count while CFOP optimizes the fluidity of turning.

The "best" method is the method that works for your strengths as a cuber.
 
I can't believe Petrus is even on these lists anymore. There are so many newer faster & more modern alternative methods than Petrus.

APB would be the 'modern' equivalent. I think Petrus (or Petrus adjacent methods) need to be included just for the fact that it's the worst best method. I think for a method to be considered one of the best it MUST be better than Petrus. That's kind of what happened with Mehta v APB.

tdlr: Petrus is goated
 
Back
Top