Astral cubing
Member
I use it for oh and 2hSame here man! I main the 354m as well
I use it for oh and 2hSame here man! I main the 354m as well
Compress the springsNo.
1. Im in the UK
2. Its slow.
Think of the valk 3 and the valk 3 power. I stand by my point.I dont want the WuQue, ok? I dont like messing with hardware.
Anyway the Valk 4 is better than the WuQue.
Why would QIYi release a new flagship if it isnt as good as something else?
Sorry if I came out as mean im just saying my opinion.
Cheers! So the Valk 4 is slower?I like the AoSu GTS2M currently, but I haven't gotten to try the Valk 4. The AoSu v2 is really fast, while The Valk 4 has differing magnet strengths, making it more adaptable to more people's turning styles.
Idk, I don’t have the thunderclapMy thunderclap 4x4 M is very slow for both inner and outer layers. I have lubed it already, but I have used slightly stronger magnets in the inner layer, making it even slower than ootb. Does spring compression help?
I would suggest that GAN progressed their technology from their the previous GES system. I personally prefer their numerical IPG to the GTS3 tensioning system.(BTW, I used both cubes as my main for thousands and thousands of solves.) The Numerical IPG has more options than the Moyu tensioning system and is, in my opinion, easier to deal with, and if you don't have enough options for you can get the IPG v5.Not true. Moyu made the GTS3 spring system and the Gan developed it through their cube.
Where are these reviews you speak of?Most of the reviews say that the Valk 4 is a lot slower than the Aosu, but a lot faster than the WuQue.
Where are these reviews you speak of?
Valk 4 with strong magnets is faster than wuque m, but slower than gts2m.I tried the MoYu cubes and I liked them. I have a rough turning style.
But wouldn't the Valk 4 be better then the WuQue?