[Unofficial] [WB] Eryk Kasperek 1.87 Clock Ao5

[An Animating Cuber]

 

[PapaSmurf]

Ok, that's insane.

 

[BVCuber13]

OMG how...actually how, this guy is insane

 

[GeographicalCuber]

How on earth?

 

[Cubist-Guitar]

This guy is so good, he’s from 2048

 

[DuckubingCuber347]

Crazy to see where we'll be in just a year

 

[BVCuber13]

@2x2MasterYT why the eyes up on the first post???

 

[2x2MasterYT]

@2x2MasterYT why the eyes up on the first post???

I don't really like Eyrk anymore after his reaction to Carter's WR single becuase he was a very bad sport about the ordeal, and he was starting arguments in the comments of Carter and Volodymr's YTWB's

 

[BVCuber13]

I don't really like Eyrk anymore after his reaction to Carter's WR single becuase he was a very bad sport about the ordeal, and he was starting arguments in the comments of Carter and Volodymr's YTWB's

That's sad to hear, but at least give the guy some respect for his WB.

 

[Clock_Enthusiast]

I don't really like Eyrk anymore after his reaction to Carter's WR single becuase he was a very bad sport about the ordeal, and he was starting arguments in the comments of Carter and Volodymr's YTWB's

It's really unfortunate if that's the case. That's not conducive to being a supportive member of the speedsolving community, especially if you're well-respected for your performance officially. It makes it easier to put people down when you're in that position.

Nevertheless, this is absolutely crazy. It's historically been a monumentous achievement to get a sub-2 single PERIOD. An Ao5 is unheard of, and Eryk has truly redefined the limits of clock solving. Amazing job.

 

[abunickabhi]

This is insanity yo!

 

[SilkCubingYT]

I don't really like Eyrk anymore after his reaction to Carter's WR single becuase he was a very bad sport about the ordeal, and he was starting arguments in the comments of Carter and Volodymr's YTWB's

There is way more going on besides this

 

[2x2MasterYT]

There is way more going on besides this

Please tell me more because i don't know what you are talking about