• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easy — create your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

[Video] My method of solving 3x3.

Dimzay2010

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
10
Hi guys,

I just got registered and did not go through all forum yet, but anyway,

I want to hear your opinion about the method that I made up in 1981.

I did videos in English that were done in Russian initially. Lots of people liked them. I have about 800.000 hits on my Russian profile in by now and I guess half of people in Russia makes 3x3 my way.

Method does not need any notations or what you call algorithms. Just general idea.
Not a speedy method and for beginners, but could be significantly improved.

It's actually edges first but totally different from the one that I saw on this site.
It's has something similar to 8355 and Petus and some others.

But I think that it's really my way as I never new them all in 1981.

So please check it out and let me know if it diseves to be registered on your site as DZ or dimzay or Dmirty Zaytsev method.

Have fun.

:)

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm in the process of watching this right now, but so far I'm just going to tell you that while is seems like a decent beginner's method, it's probably not very good for speedsolving (solving as fast as you can) and you should probably stay here if you want to learn to solve it faster.
 
Not too bad, edges first plus "Dan Brown" style corners (I know he didn't invent it, lol)

Some of your english seems a little confusing, and I bet that it would be hard to understand this video without knowing how to solve it in the first place.

Interesting method none the less, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend it to beginners.
 
That's pretty awesome you came up with that in 1981. I like it. I was wondering the other day if you could solve the cube with just R U R' U', and apparently you figured that out 30 years ago.
 
Last edited:
At the end: "Don't blame me if I explained it a little bit fast". I laughed in disbelief. It's my only complaint. The method is alright and the video is well-done, but oh boy is it loooooong. I would've much preferred you just showing a solve, I don't like to spend 25 minutes for something I could've easily understood just from a 2 minutes solve video mentioning the steps. Though of course we're not really the target audience anyway. Again, very well-done, and welcome to the forum!
 
Last edited:
My own method of solving 3x3

i found original thread and i can't delete this thread now.

sorry for making double
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately for you, this method has already been invented; it's called edges first. As you showed in your video, you solve edges and use commutators to solve the corners. If it is true that you figured it out yourself, however, I offer you my congratulations :D .
 
Unfortunately for you, this method has already been invented; it's called edges first. As you showed in your video, you solve edges and use commutators to solve the corners. If it is true that you figured it out yourself, however, I offer you my congratulations :D .

I checked edges first method on this site , but it is totally different
 
i can't delete this thread

I didn't get to read your original text. Back in the early 80's, I experimented solving in different ways. I tried corners first, then edges on the sides, then edges on the bottom, then edges on top. But it was a tad slow. My first approach was apparently Petrus (without me realizing it), because doing the final (top) layer involved messing up a side face anyway.
 
Yee i should've made this shorter. I'm thinking about chnaging the videos.

I figured out the name for the Method

RUssian R'U'lette

not 100% correct but might work
 
You explain things much better and without algorithms, but here is what I found...

http://budrik.wordpress.com/solve-the-cube-edges-first/

edit: out of curiosity, how long did it take you to figure this method out?


First time in 1981 i solved the cube in two months without any clues.
But that was not edges first. It was similar to Petrus method, but different though.

Then I totally forgot it and did not touch the cube for 25 years.

In 2008 I tried to solve 4x4 - that was hard.
I checked youtube and saw that my method for 3x3 is not there.
So I published my 3x3 method in Russian. It became popular soon.

Then I spent 4 months to develop the method of edges first to make it as simple as possible for beginners. Minimum algo. Just RUR'U' (almost).

Then i solved 4x4 my way. It took about 6 months not taking any instructions. But my method is long and not optimized. No algo or notations as well even for parities.
I have the solution on my russian youtube account.
 
Last edited:
Yee i should've made this shorter.

Well, it depends. Like I said, we're likely not the target audience for those videos. I could imagine the speed is perfectly fine for a non-cuber learning to solve. Just for the experienced cubers, a quick demo suffices to get the idea across and is less time-consuming.

Oh and I like that name :) Except it should be RU'ssian R'Ulette, you got the direction of U wrong.
 
You explain things much better and without algorithms, but here is what I found...

http://budrik.wordpress.com/solve-the-cube-edges-first/

edit: out of curiosity, how long did it take you to figure this method out?


First time in 1981 i solved the cube in two months without any clues.
But that was not eages first. It was similar to Petrus method, but different though.

Then I totally forgot it and did not touch the cube for 25 years.

In 2008 I tried to solve 4x4 - that was hard.
I checked youtube and saw that my method for 3x3 is not there.

Then I spend 4 months to develop the method of edges first to make it as simple as possible for beginners. Minimum algo. Just RUR'U' (almost).

Then i solved 4x4 my way. But it's long. No algo as well even for parities.
I have the solution on my russian youtube account.

That's quite impressive. Since you have invented this method that early I think it's yours to claim. And your name for it is nice. Also, I am Russian and would be interested in seeing your original videos. What's your user on youtube?
 
Back
Top