• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Uncommon Method Competition

Do you want to compete in the competition


  • Total voters
    15

OreKehStrah

Member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
399
As someone really interested in methods, I think this is a good idea.

However, I think the better approach would be to allow any method other than the common ones like CFOP, Roux, ZZ, Petrus. Some other potential bans could include ZB and CFCE due to how similar to CFOP/ZZ they are.

This way the competition isn't limited to a handful of methods, nor allows the common ones.

You would also need to decide whether or not multiple method useage is allowed or not. Does each average have to be method pure, or would you allow multiple methods to be used based on the scramble? Or have a multiple methods option as well?
 

Silky

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
152
As someone really interested in methods, I think this is a good idea.

However, I think the better approach would be to allow any method other than the common ones like CFOP, Roux, ZZ, Petrus. Some other potential bans could include ZB and CFCE due to how similar to CFOP/ZZ they are.

This way the competition isn't limited to a handful of methods, nor allows the common ones.

You would also need to decide whether or not multiple method useage is allowed or not. Does each average have to be method pure, or would you allow multiple methods to be used based on the scramble? Or have a multiple methods option as well?
So yes the Big 4 would be banned. My original proposal was to have 4 to 5 different methods to compete in with average of 5 and 12. I don't really understand how what you're idea would work. Would it just be who could get fastest average of 5/12 with and non-common method. I'd want full-step/ intermediate full step ( like using Waterman but not need to use all 100 algs ). And yes the average would need to be same method.

The idea behind OP is that with only having 4-5 methods when people are competing you're helping to develop the method.

If you can do any method then you're limited to the skill of the user. But with many people doing the same method you get to see how fast that method can be pushed.
 
Last edited:

OreKehStrah

Member
Joined
May 24, 2019
Messages
399
So yes the Big 4 would be banned. My original proposal was to have 4 to 5 different methods to compete in with average of 5 and 12. I don't really understand how what you're idea would work. Would it just be who could get fastest average of 5/12 with and non-common method. I'd want full-step/ intermediate full step ( like using Waterman but not need to use all 100 algs ). And yes the average would need to be same method.

The idea behind OP is that with only having 4-5 methods when people are competing you're helping to develop the method.

If you can do any method then you're limited to the skill of the user. But with many people doing the same method you get to see how fast that method can be pushed.
It needs to be up to the competitors on what non-standard method they use. Otherwise the comp isn't a celebration of other methods so much as a bit of entertainment showing the handful of methods you want to see. Some other interesting methods to see that you never even mention are the ones Devagio proposed recently: Mehta and YruRU for example.
 

Silky

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2020
Messages
152
It needs to be up to the competitors on what non-standard method they use. Otherwise the comp isn't a celebration of other methods so much as a bit of entertainment showing the handful of methods you want to see. Some other interesting methods to see that you never even mention are the ones Devagio proposed recently: Mehta and YruRU for example.
Well that why we could include those methods by consensus. The last thing I was thinking was that with choosing any method wouldn't lead to learning new methods outside their comfort zone. Like I'm a Roux solver and I could just learn PCMS. But if choosing you own method and having the winners be the best 3 best avg of 5/12 that could work.

Would banned methods just be the big 4/varients and ZB?
 

SoundBalloon

Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2018
Messages
6
Location
France
WCA
2016LEHE01
Very interesting, count me in!

Other methods I would be interested in seeing include:

1- "classical" choices
- Heise (and no cheating with ZBLL :p)
- Any blind method
- Hawaiian Kociemba
- LEOR

2- weird choices that would lots of fun
- PDQF
- HSC
- 2GB
 
Top