Okay, thank you.yes I want it in the comp
Okay, thank you.yes I want it in the comp
So yes the Big 4 would be banned. My original proposal was to have 4 to 5 different methods to compete in with average of 5 and 12. I don't really understand how what you're idea would work. Would it just be who could get fastest average of 5/12 with and non-common method. I'd want full-step/ intermediate full step ( like using Waterman but not need to use all 100 algs ). And yes the average would need to be same method.As someone really interested in methods, I think this is a good idea.
However, I think the better approach would be to allow any method other than the common ones like CFOP, Roux, ZZ, Petrus. Some other potential bans could include ZB and CFCE due to how similar to CFOP/ZZ they are.
This way the competition isn't limited to a handful of methods, nor allows the common ones.
You would also need to decide whether or not multiple method useage is allowed or not. Does each average have to be method pure, or would you allow multiple methods to be used based on the scramble? Or have a multiple methods option as well?
It needs to be up to the competitors on what non-standard method they use. Otherwise the comp isn't a celebration of other methods so much as a bit of entertainment showing the handful of methods you want to see. Some other interesting methods to see that you never even mention are the ones Devagio proposed recently: Mehta and YruRU for example.So yes the Big 4 would be banned. My original proposal was to have 4 to 5 different methods to compete in with average of 5 and 12. I don't really understand how what you're idea would work. Would it just be who could get fastest average of 5/12 with and non-common method. I'd want full-step/ intermediate full step ( like using Waterman but not need to use all 100 algs ). And yes the average would need to be same method.
The idea behind OP is that with only having 4-5 methods when people are competing you're helping to develop the method.
If you can do any method then you're limited to the skill of the user. But with many people doing the same method you get to see how fast that method can be pushed.
Well that why we could include those methods by consensus. The last thing I was thinking was that with choosing any method wouldn't lead to learning new methods outside their comfort zone. Like I'm a Roux solver and I could just learn PCMS. But if choosing you own method and having the winners be the best 3 best avg of 5/12 that could work.It needs to be up to the competitors on what non-standard method they use. Otherwise the comp isn't a celebration of other methods so much as a bit of entertainment showing the handful of methods you want to see. Some other interesting methods to see that you never even mention are the ones Devagio proposed recently: Mehta and YruRU for example.
Yes you can.can I use PCMS?
sameI would compete using Mehta.
Feel free to use ZBRoux ! You'd need to submit a video with an average of 5 and or 12 using ZBRoux. If you can include scrambles that be amazing. If you're feeling really generous you can provide reconstructions !Wait there are prizes? Suddenly intrigued. Can I use ZBroux?
What does one actually have have to submit? How do you do verification?
Feel free ! I believe @Devagio will be competing with that method !I would compete using Mehta.
This threadI might compete with the 42 method. Where exactly do I submit the vid?
Ok, I will work on getting a decent average on cam.This thread
Feel free to use ZBRoux ! You'd need to submit a video with an average of 5 and or 12 using ZBRoux. If you can include scrambles that be amazing. If you're feeling really generous you can provide reconstructions !