#### Cale S

##### Member

26 for current Weekly FMC

Spoiler

edit: nevermind this is wrong

scramble: F U' R B D F2 B R' U' L' U D' B2 F2 D2 U R F' D B2

B2 D' F // roux block

(U2 F' D R' D2) // 2x2x3

(F U F' B' U' B) // EO + square

L2 (U2 L' U L R U' L' U L R' U') // WV to LL skip

Final solution: B2 D' F L2 U R L' U' L U R' L' U' L U2 B' U B F U' F' D2 R D' F U2 (26)

interesting how the roux block just undoes the last 3 moves of the scramble

B2 D' F // roux block

(U2 F' D R' D2) // 2x2x3

(F U F' B' U' B) // EO + square

L2 (U2 L' U L R U' L' U L R' U') // WV to LL skip

Final solution: B2 D' F L2 U R L' U' L U R' L' U' L U2 B' U B F U' F' D2 R D' F U2 (26)

interesting how the roux block just undoes the last 3 moves of the scramble

2+2twisted has 8 possible combinations of commutators, 2+2pure has 16 because you can do inverses, so I think you're right.After a discussion with Yau, we were trying to figure out if a 4-corner skeleton of 2+2Twisted is better than a 2+2Pure Cycle. Or if they are exactly the same.

Not trying to make a clash between us , but the UKers thought that 2+2Twisted has more freedom, but us Dankers (Kit, Ryan, Mark and I) always thought a 2+2Pure was better because of the leniency in being able to have 1-2 or 2-1 where you can still use a comm if you find that it cancels more going the other direction.

Thinking it over, it seems like 2+2Twisted and 2+2Pure both have the same number of combinations of insertions you can find but its easier to look through all of the insertions for a 2+2Pure because you can look at 1-2-X and 2-1-X at the same time.

Is this correct or is there something else we are missing. I was just surprised because I always thought 2+2Pure was a lot better.

edit: nevermind this is wrong

Last edited: Mar 14, 2016