[WR] Stanley Chapel 1:04.60 4BLD Mean

[ILCubing]

YOOO CONGRATS TO STANLEY!!!!!
Same venue as Rowe Hessler's WR, I think
Imagine Rowe breaks MBLD WR again lmao

 

[abunickabhi]

Congrats Scalpel!

 

[pjk]

Incredible, congrats Stanley!

 

[ih8bld]

Congrats Scalpel!

Don't you not have his consent to say his name? Would recommend not saying it publicly like that without his consent.

 

[OtaMota]

 

[Caleb Valenzuela]

Don't you not have his consent to say his name? Would recommend not saying it publicly like that without his consent.

View attachment 41129

is there something offensive about saying Stanley’s name like that?

 

[ih8bld]

is there something offensive about saying Stanley’s name like that?

No, that is his name on discord.

It was referring to how abunickabhi who has a long history of spite with Stanley decided to make a post using a screenshot from Stanley's video and making up a fake reason of "not having his consent" to not give him credit. Then deleted the post to avoid taking responsibility

Doesn't make much sense that he can say his name now

 

[abunickabhi]

Closing this thread as the record has been updated and this is a former record

Edit: Apologies for my brain fart

 

[xyzzy]

stop locking threads for bad reasons!!

 

[abunickabhi]

I apologise for locking the thread, it was an oversight from me.

Henceforth, former records in this category are allowed to be open. They need not be closed.

Again my apologies for the oversight and lack of protocol.

 

[Caleb Valenzuela]

Closing this thread as the record has been updated and this is a former record

what’s the WR now?

 

[abunickabhi]

what’s the WR now?

59.39s mean in the second round of the same competition, the next day.

A good thing in this comp is that Rowe also got 2 4BLD means!

Multi in this comp could have been scheduled better, as there were a lot of blow outs from competitors.

 

[abunickabhi]

No, that is his name on discord.

It was referring to how abunickabhi who has a long history of spite with Stanley decided to make a post using a screenshot from Stanley's video and making up a fake reason of "not having his consent" to not give him credit. Then deleted the post to avoid taking responsibility

Doesn't make much sense that he can say his name now

Sorry for being off-topic on this thread but I want to clarify one misunderstanding.

I do not avoid taking responsibility. I admit I should be careful while citing a person or their work. I understand if I have made a mistake in creating a topic, I have the right to delete it, after I admit my reason for change of thought , take responsibility and then close the topic to avoid further damage. I am not undoing my mistake or avoiding responsibility in any way.

Apologies again for this confusion and escalation.