• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Square-1 full PLL+2


Jun 13, 2019
could this actually make lin a viable method?
Lin is already a viable method and this hardly makes it better.

The 72-algs sets are intended as alternatives to PLL+1, not supplements.
they solve cases of the same depth,
and conversion between any two of them only takes an M2 [2|4],
which is theoretically the move you save using all 3 sets compared to just one,
but its also already the average difference between a good [6|] case in one set
and its corresponding "worse" [8|] case in another set.
The only time youd get any further additional gain would be
when the optimal alg coincidentally starts with M2, which evidently is very rare.

I initially developed the 3-cycle set as my own choice among the 3 over the original pll+1 for better recognition.

Want to hide this ad and support the community?