Lol. Don't use the words "easy" and "CP" in the same postFor easy intuitive, you can:
1. F2L-1 + EO
3. Create and insert the last F2L pair while ensuring an LL corner is oriented
4. EPLL - Recognize by looking at the oriented corner.
You can combine steps 2 and 3 or rearrange the steps a little to fit what you like; such as doing CP after the F2L pair. For efficiency while solving intuitively, the Heise techniques mentioned by RedstoneTim are probably the best way to go.
Of course CP without the last F2L corner placed isn't so easy without using tricks. So that's why the suggestion of rearranging steps was given. I think I was wrongly assuming that the intention of TerryD was slow solving and not speed solving and so I meant "simple" instead of "easy". Simple as in broken into smaller, more manageable steps compared to Heise. For speed solving, intuitive things like this and Heise have yet to be shown as viable. As nice as that would be.Lol. Don't use the words "easy" and "CP" in the same post
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Snyder Method||Cubing Help & Questions||2|
|[Unofficial] 3x3 - 23.40 avg5 with Snyder Method 2||Puzzle Video Gallery||3|
|[Unofficial] 14.59 avg5, 16.31 avg12 Snyder Method 2 (zero algs)||Puzzle Video Gallery||8|
|J||Snyder Method Fish V2 Step (Fish Step Ver.2)||How-to's, Guides, etc.||7|
|Snyder Method||General Speedcubing Discussion||20|