Would it be "worth it"? It purely depends on how much you care about OH. If you are serious about OH then Roux is definitely the way to go. Roux is the future of OH, and the only reason it doesn't have all the official WR's right now is because Fahmi hasn't been able to go to comps.Would it be worth it to learn roux for OH if I main CFOP for 3x3?
That isn't true. FB can have those moves as well as several CMLL algorithms. Roux does have very good ergonomics if you can do M moves but so does ZZ. Roux is very efficient, doesn't require a lot of algs (unless you want to explore ACMLL or whatever it's called) and in something like OH where you aren't turning as fast its slightly worse lookahead isn't as big of a factor.No need to use F or B moves during solutions.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Roux or Cfop (i will just use petrus)||General Speedcubing Discussion||19|
|W||Practicing zz, cfop and roux||Cubing Progression||9|
|B||Time Split - CFOP&Roux (for Newbie)||General Speedcubing Discussion||0|
|X||Do CFOP users have different preference of cubes than Roux users||General Speedcubing Discussion||23|
|The Roux vs. CFOP debate is getting out of hand||General Speedcubing Discussion||18|