LukasCubes
Member
My averages with waterman compared to the big 4 (I know full OLL PLL CMLL and about 130 ZBLL, and I suck at EOI average sub-10
With 2 holes I average sub-13
16 Waterman
18 CFOP
18 Roux
20 ZZ
20 Petrus
My averages with waterman compared to the big 4 (I know full OLL PLL CMLL and about 130 ZBLL, and I suck at EOI average sub-10
With 2 holes I average sub-13
nice averagesMy averages with waterman compared to the big 4 (I know full OLL PLL CMLL and about 130 ZBLL, and I suck at EO
16 Waterman
18 CFOP
18 Roux
20 ZZ
20 Petrus
nice. I haven't fully learned 2 holes so i wouldn't join that.
oooooooh i should join
this has beginners, intermediate and advanced solvers. so you can join if you want to.nice. I haven't fully learned 2 holes so i wouldn't join that.
Did great in online comp. Got a 11.27 Ao5 with 2 holes with a 8.35 single. (37th out of 503 people)everyone, I have got an online comp tomorrow.
I have to prove that this method is as good as other methods when under nerves.
so wish me luck.
LolJust realized there are 11 progression threads in the main page...
This is just a worse version of RibbonEveryone I just came up with another new method designed for speedsolving.
Or a worse version of MehtaThis is just a worse version of Ribbon
Please stop giving negative comments. And this is not a worse version of ribbon it is actually better than CFOP in terms of TPS.This is just a worse version of Ribbon
Then stop making claims you've "invented" something new, when you are just making another version of an already proposed idea.Please stop giving negative comments. And this is not a worse version of ribbon it is actually better than CFOP in terms of TPS.
Or a worse version of Mehta
This is just a worse version of Ribbon
@xtreme cuber2007 I agree. Every time im on this site, I always see someone making negative comments to either me or someone else and Im sick and tired of it. Its ridiculous how many people is here and acting more dumb than me and thats saying something. I dont know what new method he proposed but it is now removed because of these shitty comments. People should have the right to post a new method they came up with without everyone saying "This is a worse version of ____" and stuff like that and Its ridiculous. btw I would like to see how the method works DM me on discord about the new method.Please stop giving negative comments. And this is not a worse version of ribbon it is actually better than CFOP in terms of TPS.
But what if it is just a worse version of something else? It’s not being mean, it’s just telling the truth. It’s better to tell them it’s bad than to say nothing and have them thinking that it has potential.@xtreme cuber2007 I agree. Every time im on this site, I always see someone making negative comments to either me or someone else and Im sick and tired of it. Its ridiculous how many people is here and acting more dumb than me and thats saying something. I dont know what new method he proposed but it is now removed because of these shitty comments. People should have the right to post a new method they came up with without everyone saying "This is a worse version of ____" and stuff like that and Its ridiculous. btw I would like to see how the method works DM me on discord about the new method.
I'd rather think wrong and happy about a method than sad or mad but right about that same method. I like to give things a chance (unlike yall big-4 users)But what if it is just a worse version of something else? It’s not being mean, it’s just telling the truth. It’s better to tell them it’s bad than to say nothing and have them thinking that it has potential.
i agree. If you tell them that it is worth it they will never reach their potential. The objective of comments like these that may come across as mean are actually constructive and helpfulBut what if it is just a worse version of something else? It’s not being mean, it’s just telling the truth. It’s better to tell them it’s bad than to say nothing and have them thinking that it has potential.
Those thoughts then, are misguided. I get that your statement is largely opinionated, but if you are happy and feel accomplished by doing something inventing something which you never really invented, do you really have the right to remain content about it? Additionally, I don't why one would have any reason to be sad or mad about it, at least in this scenario.I'd rather think wrong and happy about a method than sad or mad but right about that same method.
Are you discriminating people who use the big-4 as people who don't give things a chance? That's simply wrong for reasons that are self-explanatory.I like to give things a chance (unlike yall big-4 users)