EntireTV
Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2015
- Messages
- 384
Fun...
Stop Lq posting please
Fun...
Just started practicing this and got a really lucky 18.91! Any tips on getting consistently sub 15?
I would like to see a video. I am curious to see how speedsolving of this cube looks like.Just got a couple UWRs! 11.74 average of 5 (pretty lucky; two counting 11s and a counting 12), and a 14.93 average of 12! This thing is really fun...
I would like to see a video. I am curious to see how speedsolving of this cube looks like.
Just did ~ 250 solves and broke all the UWRs
Single 8.83
avg5 11.62
avg12 12.91
avg50 14.42
avg100 14.69
I managed to drop around 0.5 seconds after modifying my puzzle slightly so that's cool.
Either way, I'm going to need to practice a bit...
I disassembled the cube until only the screws and centre bases were left on, then i got some pliers and cut of around half a centimetre off of the three sticky outy bits(the ends of the traingular centre base) on each base (24 in total). After reassembling there was a lot less catching than before.
0: 0
1: 0
2: 0
3: 0
4: 0
5: 0
6: 0
7: 0
8: 1
9: 1
10: 13
11: 84
12: 477
13: 1848
14: 4310
15: 3013
16: 252
17: 1
View attachment 8305 Ok, just got an 8.25 single. Its already been updated on the wiki.
cool I'll do the mod as well thenI just got my Redi Cube the other day. It is a really fun solve and I also found out that it is tensionable. Just take the edges out and split the corners. There are screws under the corners. Five full screw turns seems to be the perfect tension. With the edges out, I put some SCS Galaxy on the ball core itself, as the pieces contact it directly. I also put a combination of Galaxy and DNM-37 on the pieces. Doing this setup instantly dropped my times by around 3 seconds (35-32). I strongly recommend it. I also got a 31.83 AO50 on a stream tonight using the random state scrambler by @xyzzy and I plan to do another AO50 on stream tomorrow or Saturday.
Im currently creating "1LLL" for Redi Cube, where you solve the last seven pieces (5 edges + 2 centres) in 1 algorithm. Quite a lot of the cases would be 3-cycles but there will be some long algorithms.
1. 6:17.952 B L' b f r b' r b' l B' R' B F' L' R' F
lol redi bld, is this uwr
I am so bad at memo and recall (2:17.548 memo, 4:00.404 execution). Sub-10 memo + sub-25 execution is probably easy for fast BLDers.
Edges are just 3-cycles with sledgehammers and sexy moves; I think at most two setup moves are needed in the worst case? Corner twists are done two at a time: solve UFL and UFR, then x' and repeat.
One-twist alg is same as on a pyraminx: F R F R' F R F R' (+ mirrors)
Every two-twist case is 10 moves optimal: X Y X Y X Y' X' Y' X' Y' where X twists the first corner to be solved and Y twists it the "wrong" direction.
Unrelated: Ran 10000 random states through an optimal solver (took a bit over an hour of CPU time), and got this distribution of move counts.
Average is around 14.04 optimal, with God's number being at least 17. (Assuming there are no bugs in my solver.)Code:0: 0 1: 0 2: 0 3: 0 4: 0 5: 0 6: 0 7: 0 8: 1 9: 1 10: 13 11: 84 12: 477 13: 1848 14: 4310 15: 3013 16: 252 17: 1
The "checkerboard"/cross pattern is the approximate equivalent of a superflip on a 3×3×3 (every piece is as far from solved as possible + lots of symmetry), but this one can be solved with only 16 moves: (F B l r) (f b L R) (F B l r)' (f b L R)'. If you replace all the moves with ccw turns, then you get the pure 8-twist, which is also 16 moves optimal. I wonder if there's a symmetric ≥17-move pattern.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
redi cube | Hardware Area | 10 | ||
help on redi cube notation | Cubing Help & Questions | 3 | ||
My redi cube progression | Cubing Progression | 4 | ||
how to scramble | Cubing Help & Questions | 0 | ||
Is there any community for Master Pyraminx or Redi Cube | General Speedcubing Discussion | 0 |