# Random Cubing Discussion

#### Kirjava

##### Colourful
Solve two opposite faces, ignoring permutation and the E slice.

#### StachuK1992

##### statue
Ooh, I'm liking that. It feels like an expanded Roux block to me, not like Sq-1 cubeshape so much. I'm doing L and R.
Hrm.

Edit:
How many algs would that be after that step? ish.

Edit 2: this is looking nicer and nicer with each solve

Last edited:

#### Kirjava

##### Colourful
It's like Sq1 in the way that it uses a 'flowcharting' based method to solve it. Unless you're doing it differently to me

I just had a solve where phase 2 was R2B2L2 N perm. ****'s lucky.

#### Kirjava

##### Colourful

Last edited by a moderator:

#### Martijn

##### Member
Anyone tried the 30th year anniversary wooden cube yet?

#### StachuK1992

##### statue
What would be a badass way to apply Triangular Francisco to big cubes?

#### Escher

##### Babby
Human Kociemba is sexy as ****.

#### oprah62

##### Member
human centipide is f*cking crazy.

#### StachuK1992

##### statue
Human Kociemba is sexy as ****.

But how does one transfer this to big cubes?
It doesn't need to be good. Just sexy and TF.

It's ugly.

#### riffz

##### Member
human centipide is f*cking crazy.

You're really pleased with yourself, aren't you? You also posted that in the youtube description.

#### CharlesOBlack

##### Member
What would be a badass way to apply Triangular Francisco to big cubes?

maybe:

-opposite centers
-triangle
-4 centers
-edges

then whatever else TFM does on 3x3.

#### qqwref

##### Member
2x2 method idea:
0) 2x1 block of the same color on left half of D face.
1) Orient remaining 6 pieces without messing up the block.
2) Finish sorting by placing the other two pieces of the D color.
3) PBL.

Step 1 can easily be done in inspection, and steps 1+2 should be reasonable. Step 1 can often be done efficiently 2gen, and step 2 always can. I kinda like the idea of pure 2gen up to PBL.

Last edited:

#### Faz

##### Former Clock NR Holder
Cool method bro

2.65, 3.16, 2.65, 2.36, 3.15, 4.91, 2.77, 3.83, 3.58, 1.34, 3.80, 3.40 = 3.14

wat Faz

#### uberCuber

##### Member
Cool method bro

2.65, 3.16, 2.65, 2.36, 3.15, 4.91, 2.77, 3.83, 3.58, 1.34, 3.80, 3.40 = 3.14

the fu--

#### vcuber13

##### Member
92 of the top 100 averages are from 2010.

#### qqwref

##### Member
Do I smell CLS?
It's a similar concept to CLS/SS. However, since you are orienting 6 pieces instead of orienting 5 and placing 1, you have more freedom, and you can often start off with a few moves that make the rest very easy.