• Welcome to SpeedSolving.com — the world’s largest puzzle community!

    You’re currently browsing as a guest, which means you have limited access to discussions, resources, member profiles, and community features.

    Join 50,000+ cubers and puzzle enthusiasts from around the world to ask questions, share solves, improve faster, and be part of the community.

    Registration is free, fast, and easycreate your account today.

    Already a member? Log in here to hide this message and start participating.

Puzzle Ideas/Innovations/Prototypes Thread

I was thinking of this idea recently:

Instead of triangular shaped corner feet, we use circular shaped corner feet instead. In addition, we could even make the corner feet free-spinning now as well (since it is circular after all). Would this theoretically improve corner cutting? Also, core magnets can be kept if the center of the corner feet remains non-free-spinning. I will provide a sketch/sample photo later. I also do not have access to a 3D printer so i can’t try this out for myself
 
Last edited:
I was thinking of this idea recently:

Instead of triangular shaped corner feet, we use circular shaped corner feet instead. In addition, we could even make the corner feet free-spinning now as well (since it is circular after all). Would this theoretically improve corner cutting? Also, core magnets can be kept if the center of the corner feet remains non-free-spinning. I will provide a sketch/sample photo later. I also do not have access to a 3D printer so i can’t try this out for myself
I have an old 3x3 design that I was so ashamed of I deleted the design and have the cube in a box and I haven’t looked at it in years. However… it has circular corner feet. And I probably didn’t do it right cuz the cube doesnt turn at all. Something to think about with a rotating corner foot is that a corner has three points of contact so it might not turn that well. A design like this also allows for more corner twists.
 
I have an old 3x3 design that I was so ashamed of I deleted the design and have the cube in a box and I haven’t looked at it in years. However… it has circular corner feet. And I probably didn’t do it right cuz the cube doesnt turn at all. Something to think about with a rotating corner foot is that a corner has three points of contact so it might not turn that well. A design like this also allows for more corner twists.
circle has an infinite amount of verticies. it woulf also make the cube heavier. i doubt cube manufacturers have not tried this before.
 
sorry but i didn’t really understand this
Does it have to do with the geometry of a cube?
Also wouldn’t that effect be negated by the circular corner foot?
geometry of the cube is the most important part. a corner in a cube contacts three edges at a time. A wheel can roll easily when in contact with two surfaces traveling in the opposite direction, however an introduction of a third surface hinders the rolling. Now this is only a problem of course if you are trying to implement the spinning circle corner foot idea. A statice circle may indeed have benefits, but like what @SpeedCubingLord said, it’s probably been tested.
 
geometry of the cube is the most important part. a corner in a cube contacts three edges at a time. A wheel can roll easily when in contact with two surfaces traveling in the opposite direction, however an introduction of a third surface hinders the rolling. Now this is only a problem of course if you are trying to implement the spinning circle corner foot idea. A statice circle may indeed have benefits, but like what @SpeedCubingLord said, it’s probably been tested.
Try putting either marbles or mini wheels on them. This is what the qy toys pyraminx did for one of their models. Then your circular corner foot will have minimized resistance. Just an idea that is open to criticism...
 
Wouldn't a circular/hexagonal foot increase corner twists? Idk, just saying
that probably would, but i was thinking that the pointed corners would negate that
Circular(good idea,but is more prone to twists)and hexagonal(arguable and is very similar to circular)reduce the points of contact. The less contact,the less resistance. That's why I like Caleb's idea,and modified it. But pointed corners? That would work if the stem leading to the foot was slim... I like that also!
 
I thought of another idea inspired by the YJ MGC Sigma
What if we put wide corner-core/corner feet to edge feet magnets so that the magnetic pull will be stronger, which will align the layers better which would then reduce lock ups. The piece to piece magnets could be weaker as well so that the corner-core magnets do more of the work. Think of something like the GAN 12 Maglev type of auto-alignment
 
I thought of another idea inspired by the YJ MGC Sigma
What if we put wide corner-core/corner feet to edge feet magnets so that the magnetic pull will be stronger, which will align the layers better which would then reduce lock ups. The piece to piece magnets could be weaker as well so that the corner-core magnets do more of the work. Think of something like the GAN 12 Maglev type of auto-alignment
Sounds cool, and it just might work...
Strong magnets are a problem at times, but this is a decent idea. And,if the magnets are closer to the core(I have my magnets scratching the core on rs3)then they will not only be stronger, but have more alignment also.
 
Back
Top