Hello everyone,
This is a serious attempt to make this algset work or atleast use a subset of it. The method is used in blindsolving to solve 4 edges at once using a ~10.4 move commutator.
Disclaimer:
5-style is an experimental algset, it does not work at the elite level currently. I love 5-style algset. It solves 5 edges on the 3x3 and will be mainly used in MBLD event. A lot of top BLDers are not convinced that it is useful and would make anyone faster. I do not want to feel good/superior or boost my ego by putting out these updates. I do not get enough free time to drill the algs or revise them on Anki. I have propagated misinformation about 5-style and letter quads in the past. I hope to not do it again. A lot of years have been spent developing it and there is no inertia currently to learn it. I have one passed 51k algs, but that does not mean I can reproduce them in actual solves, that factor is variable and depends on the practice and sharpness of the cuber.
My goal for 100 points in MBLD is wishful thinking and I have made no progress towards it. As a BLDer, I have made no progress from 2017 because of life and a lot of work on 5-style. I am not the best person to do this set, this is just an attempt. Please do not troll, I will forgive and not block, but I dislike trolls. It is a lot of mental effort to make UF5 work, and trolling is the last thing I want to receive. I respect all cubers and understand my limitations and weaknesses. The wishful thinking is to get sub-10 exec in MBLD so that 100 points is possible in MBLD someday using LQ and UF5 may not work and I have to accept this fact. I am ready to accept that 5-style can tarnish my image in the cubing community as I am attempting something infeasible with no common sense and will to listen to cubers faster than me.
Currently it is waaayyyy harder to learn 5-style compared to 3-style. There have been no proven gains. It saves about 3.5 moves per comm but this does not imply that there is time saved in execution.
I hid the development and idea of the algset for 4 years as I was unsure if it was viable. Since 2018, this algset has been receiving negativity from all BLDers who are faster than me except for a few. I do want to implement this algset one day. A lot of years were spent in developing the algset though, like Letter quads, UF5, differences from 2e2e' etc.
Just to give a peek, the easiest 5-style algset is M U M' U' and there are 39 more 4 movers from one buffer. The average movecount is 10.38 STM which is a lot of move saving. The algs are more speed optimal than move optimal, although it is hard to decide clearly.
5-style is a cool concept but it is not fully executed yet
Docs (concepts here are provocative so take them with a pinch of salt)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x-gGoO4mzYkHuQoZXQcvrQLDLU_x_UYb460y58OJ8ss/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b3tT8Wv18WdzFyY7FujyptwzYeWFH8K-UXTddTvwUWw/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfDsydw6pxBftd8Xwik95FNjILGkdrJMBO5EORbftII/edit?usp=sharing
This is a serious attempt to make this algset work or atleast use a subset of it. The method is used in blindsolving to solve 4 edges at once using a ~10.4 move commutator.
Disclaimer:
5-style is an experimental algset, it does not work at the elite level currently. I love 5-style algset. It solves 5 edges on the 3x3 and will be mainly used in MBLD event. A lot of top BLDers are not convinced that it is useful and would make anyone faster. I do not want to feel good/superior or boost my ego by putting out these updates. I do not get enough free time to drill the algs or revise them on Anki. I have propagated misinformation about 5-style and letter quads in the past. I hope to not do it again. A lot of years have been spent developing it and there is no inertia currently to learn it. I have one passed 51k algs, but that does not mean I can reproduce them in actual solves, that factor is variable and depends on the practice and sharpness of the cuber.
My goal for 100 points in MBLD is wishful thinking and I have made no progress towards it. As a BLDer, I have made no progress from 2017 because of life and a lot of work on 5-style. I am not the best person to do this set, this is just an attempt. Please do not troll, I will forgive and not block, but I dislike trolls. It is a lot of mental effort to make UF5 work, and trolling is the last thing I want to receive. I respect all cubers and understand my limitations and weaknesses. The wishful thinking is to get sub-10 exec in MBLD so that 100 points is possible in MBLD someday using LQ and UF5 may not work and I have to accept this fact. I am ready to accept that 5-style can tarnish my image in the cubing community as I am attempting something infeasible with no common sense and will to listen to cubers faster than me.
Currently it is waaayyyy harder to learn 5-style compared to 3-style. There have been no proven gains. It saves about 3.5 moves per comm but this does not imply that there is time saved in execution.
I hid the development and idea of the algset for 4 years as I was unsure if it was viable. Since 2018, this algset has been receiving negativity from all BLDers who are faster than me except for a few. I do want to implement this algset one day. A lot of years were spent in developing the algset though, like Letter quads, UF5, differences from 2e2e' etc.
Just to give a peek, the easiest 5-style algset is M U M' U' and there are 39 more 4 movers from one buffer. The average movecount is 10.38 STM which is a lot of move saving. The algs are more speed optimal than move optimal, although it is hard to decide clearly.
5-style is a cool concept but it is not fully executed yet

Docs (concepts here are provocative so take them with a pinch of salt)
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1x-gGoO4mzYkHuQoZXQcvrQLDLU_x_UYb460y58OJ8ss/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b3tT8Wv18WdzFyY7FujyptwzYeWFH8K-UXTddTvwUWw/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bfDsydw6pxBftd8Xwik95FNjILGkdrJMBO5EORbftII/edit?usp=sharing
Last edited: