Tao Yu
Member
I have a bunch of Petrus example solves in this playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1IBpMtcY5y-NSiYGmb9gZEGE2q7D0Gm
You can learn a lot from CFOP/Freefop and ZZ example solves as well, especially as all CFOP F2L cases can appear in Petrus, xcross often requires Petrus style blockbuilding, and because Petrus after the EO step is essentially the same as ZZ. There should be plenty of these on youtube.
I've reconstructed most of a 9.91 Petrus avg12 done by me here: https://pastebin.com/yJ9VShQD. The solutions are really bad though - you really don't need perfect solves for sub 10. If you get rid of many of the inefficient things I do, and develop blockbuilding lookahead further than others have done already, I think sub 8 should definitely be possible.
My biggest piece of advice is to experiment and be open minded. Nobody has gotten sub 8 Petrus before, and nobody knows the best way to practise to achieve it. So it's up to you to analyse your solves carefully, and decide on the best way forward for you. Good luck!
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLx1IBpMtcY5y-NSiYGmb9gZEGE2q7D0Gm
You can learn a lot from CFOP/Freefop and ZZ example solves as well, especially as all CFOP F2L cases can appear in Petrus, xcross often requires Petrus style blockbuilding, and because Petrus after the EO step is essentially the same as ZZ. There should be plenty of these on youtube.
I've reconstructed most of a 9.91 Petrus avg12 done by me here: https://pastebin.com/yJ9VShQD. The solutions are really bad though - you really don't need perfect solves for sub 10. If you get rid of many of the inefficient things I do, and develop blockbuilding lookahead further than others have done already, I think sub 8 should definitely be possible.
My biggest piece of advice is to experiment and be open minded. Nobody has gotten sub 8 Petrus before, and nobody knows the best way to practise to achieve it. So it's up to you to analyse your solves carefully, and decide on the best way forward for you. Good luck!