• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

My cube-manipulating robot

Status
Not open for further replies.

DarioRubik

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2012
Messages
140
WCA
2011SANC02
YouTube
Visit Channel
Built this for a school project. It doesn't really "solve" the cube ,and it's not completely stable (hence, I had to hold it constantly), but it works.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Very nice! It would be awesome if this could be slightly improved for stability and speed, mass produced, and used for scrambling. Would alleviate some of the scrambling issues at comps.
 
Thanks everyone! this shows how well the effort pays :).

Very nice! It would be awesome if this could be slightly improved for stability and speed, mass produced, and used for scrambling. Would alleviate some of the scrambling issues at comps.

I actually thought of this, yeah. It would be so great! If mass produced, it would be really cheap, and would save time, human errors and (possibly) cheating.
 
For the bigger cubes these robots could make a difference in scrambling. However, at 3x3 normally, a fast scrambler can achieve sub 10 with getting the cube scrambling it and putting it in the box. The robot cant keep up with that :) Still great design!

most sub10 solvers can scramble in about 5-7 seconds, if a robot could perform a 20-25 move scramble at 10 tps that's already 2-2.5 seconds, much faster than any fast human scrambler
 
most sub10 solvers can scramble in about 5-7 seconds, if a robot could perform a 20-25 move scramble at 10 tps that's already 2-2.5 seconds, much faster than any fast human scrambler

I scramble sub 5 with nearly perfect accuracy, I feel like actually putting the cube in a robot and then removing it to put with the card/box is just not worth it.
 
Nice work! I like the idea of using it for scrambles - even though Kennan makes a great point of how fast it can be humanly done, I like allowing someone who is not fast run these through a scramble robot...ok I just think it would look cool.
 
Nice!

So what motors did you use? And did you program the ROM with like PicBASIC?
Standard hobby servos (towerpro sg90 for claws, and futaba s3003 for arms. I programmed it with a very simple software tool called TOROBOT. It shows every servo as a slider and you can manually control them and create programs. I plan on switching to arduino for more complex development of the project.
 
Nice!!! Aolong did it take for making it???
And What do you mean by "It doesn't really "solve" the cube"??
You mean it just reverses the scramble

I started designing it about 7 moths ago. Yep, that's everything it does.

I bump that

Also was that a 42 mm or 50 zhanchi?

50mm

is it a pre-programmed set of moves or can it understand notation?

It's just pre-programmed randomly, but I've been thinking about writing a notation library so it can execute algs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top