StachuK1992
statue
Several years ago, I popularized the term "The Big Four," in reference to what I, at the time, thought were the four most powerful speedcubing methods.
http://stachu.cubing.net/rants/methodrantings.html
Petrus was always 4th place in my head, and I considered it inferior to the other methods.
Why?
I'm personally not sure.
Maybe it's due to empirical evidence as I haven't seen anyone 'fast' do petrus in a while.
Maybe the blocks take just a bit more brain-power than Roux's.
Maybe it's the awkward rotations between the 2x2x2, 2x2x3, and EO that I always seem to do.
For me, ZZ's the obvious choice for OH, and CFOP, ZZ, and Roux all seem to be equals in my head for 2H.
Thoughts? Why do I discriminate against Petrus?
http://stachu.cubing.net/rants/methodrantings.html
Petrus was always 4th place in my head, and I considered it inferior to the other methods.
Why?
I'm personally not sure.
Maybe it's due to empirical evidence as I haven't seen anyone 'fast' do petrus in a while.
Maybe the blocks take just a bit more brain-power than Roux's.
Maybe it's the awkward rotations between the 2x2x2, 2x2x3, and EO that I always seem to do.
For me, ZZ's the obvious choice for OH, and CFOP, ZZ, and Roux all seem to be equals in my head for 2H.
Thoughts? Why do I discriminate against Petrus?