• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 35,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Learn 5-style: You can do it!

Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
643
Likes
209
Location
Yo
WCA
2013GHOD01
YouTube
abunickabhi
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
938
Likes
570
Location
Utah
WCA
2016BAIR01
#2
Bunch of random questions and critique.



Has any research been done with different buffers? On your document you make it sound like the only reason you are pushing DF/DFR is because that is what you started with. I feel like even if difference is negligible between buffers for 5style it would make the most sense to use UF/UFR so you can fill in the gaps where you don’t know the 5style cases with the best algs.



Wouldn’t it make more sense to move the 5style algs over to a google sheet? Right now it’s a huge list that’s difficult to navigate but with sheets you could make 26 tabs (what the first target of the 5cycle is) and it would make it a lot easier to sort through. You could also enable commenting so people could suggest good algs that they find.



Also have some critiques for the 5 year plan :p



Year 1 - remove the music stuff, not really pertinent to cubing. Just practicing cubing will make their fingers more nimble.

Year 2 - recommends orozco and then 3style with UF UFR, if the method uses DF DFR then their 3style should probably reflect that.

Year 3 - no comment

Year 4 - that’s a LOT of algs, even with memoing with quads that’s 164 algs per day. Wouldn’t it make sense to spread it out a bit more and maybe combine some previous years or maybe learn letter quads as you learn 5style? I feel like the rate they have to work at is a bit too much and is going to cause the few people who may attempt to learn this set to burn out.

Year 5 - drill all algs and make them sub 1 on the gikker cube. I don’t think most of these algs are sub 1able. Do you plan fixing the algs yourself or having others contribute to your alg database?
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
938
Likes
570
Location
Utah
WCA
2016BAIR01
#4
Is this real?
Isn’t there already ~800 cases for 3-style, and how many for 5-style? 100,000?
Yes but I’m not sure if it’s doable/viable

378 for corners, 440 edges. Not too crazy since it’s intuitive. Full floating is 2768 which only a few people know or are close to knowing still intuitive though.

5style is almost never intuitive and has about 12600 edge algorithms and about 80000 corner algs.

Just for references on big alg sets zbll is 493 and 1LLL is 3915
 
Joined
May 27, 2018
Messages
222
Likes
140
Location
United States
WCA
2018ISOM02
YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzgIKWl
#5
I know that 3-style algs are pretty intuitive and short so that learning all 818 cases is not all that hard, much easier than ZBLL despite having “only” 493 algs.

But if 5-style algorithms aren’t intuitive comms like 3-style is, and the algs are longer, then 5-style is actually the equivalent of learning ZBLL times 190.

And also memory retention would be practically impossible because you run into each case like what.... in 0.00005% of solves?

If you want to make a breakthrough in blind solving, then it’ll have to be something other than 5-style...
 
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
643
Likes
209
Location
Yo
WCA
2013GHOD01
YouTube
abunickabhi
Thread starter #6
Thanks for the critique, Samuel.
I do not plan on using the DF/DFR buffer for 5-Style. No way, DFR is a too ancient buffer and 5 cycle algs with it are bad.

In fact, two 3-Style corners algs are already faster than one 5-Style alg. I stackmatted and saw it. (So, the end goal is to have floating/UFR repertoire with floating 5-style edge algs and UFR corners) For the time being UF 5-cycles excluding the DF piece is not being developed.

The good thing about 5 Style is that UF and DF both share the same buffer in many cases like 20-30% of them. So we can have the same algorithm for the UF, that the DF has which involves the UF piece.

I intend to share the google sheet by next year and help other people contribute to better algs and also UF specific algs which do not involve the DF buffer, which I can treat as floating algs if I stick to UF. This is a personal endeavor as of now, and I personally prefer DF over UF although it does not make that much of a difference for 5-Style as compared to 3-Style (DF vs UF).

I just created this thread to get the opinion of BLDers on whether they will be willing to accept this idea in the future if this method gets developed and simplified. But for the proof of concept, I want to keep it personal for a year and get good official results using these algorithms and memorization techniques.

I have been making Letter quads for the last 3 years and have already improved my memo significantly. For the execution part in year 5, I think most of the algs are sub-1 able, and I will try and grind to get there.
 

mark49152

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
4,635
Likes
3,133
Location
UK
WCA
2015RIVE05
YouTube
mark49152
#7
But for the proof of concept, I want to keep it personal for a year and get good official results using these algorithms and memorization techniques.
That's a good approach. You'll gain way more credibility if you can prove it is feasible before you advocate it.
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Messages
441
Likes
197
#9
I don't know much about blind but why don't you just do 4style instead?
Old Pochmann is a 2-cycle method, meaning you cycle 2 Pieces and solve one at a time - this only works if you also permute an even number of pieces of the other type (3BLD only for simplification, Corners and Edges)
Now 3-Style up's things by cycling 3 pieces and solving 2 (Orozko and Eka left out for simplification) at a time by using commutators. Now, 4-Style would go back to the old formula OP uses which would be basically a downgrade again from 5-Style and it's commutatorish properties. Not to mention Parity is nicer to deal with (if 5-style would be adopted before full Parity)
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
938
Likes
570
Location
Utah
WCA
2016BAIR01
#10
Old Pochmann is a 2-cycle method, meaning you cycle 2 Pieces and solve one at a time - this only works if you also permute an even number of pieces of the other type (3BLD only for simplification, Corners and Edges)
Now 3-Style up's things by cycling 3 pieces and solving 2 (Orozko and Eka left out for simplification) at a time by using commutators. Now, 4-Style would go back to the old formula OP uses which would be basically a downgrade again from 5-Style and it's commutatorish properties. Not to mention Parity is nicer to deal with (if 5-style would be adopted before full Parity)
It’s less algs than 5style and is just as intuitive, it’s definitely more doable so I could see that becoming a thing before 5style. You could even end up using it as parity for some cases you would run into if you did learn 5style
 
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Messages
441
Likes
197
#11
It’s less algs than 5style and is just as intuitive, it’s definitely more doable so I could see that becoming a thing before 5style. You could even end up using it as parity for some cases you would run into if you did learn 5style
Less algs is true, I didn't think of that but please elaborate on how it's just as intuitive.
Using it as Parity would defenitely be possible, but we have to see if for the majority of cases doing a 4-Style alg is faster than doing one comm and a Parity algorithm
 
Top