• Welcome to the Speedsolving.com, home of the web's largest puzzle community!
    You are currently viewing our forum as a guest which gives you limited access to join discussions and access our other features.

    Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community of 40,000+ people from around the world today!

    If you are already a member, simply login to hide this message and begin participating in the community!

Human Thistlethwaite Algorithm

Lotsofsloths

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
1,250
Location
Williamsburg, VA
WCA
2007SAHA01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I've looked at Heise's page on it along with another tutorial on youtube.
But I still can't seem to understand the exact steps of the method..
I know you limit the moves down to only ( R, F, B, L)2 moves..
and in this order:
Ryan Heise's Site said:
Phase 1 -> <U,D,L,R,F2,B2> group

- simple, no algorithms

Phase 2 -> <U,D,L2,R2,F2,B2> group

- Direct up/down edges to up/down face (simple, no algs)
- Direct corners to up/down face (between 8 and 60 algs)

Phase 3 -> <U2,D2,L2,R2,F2,B2> group

- Corners (between 1 and 2 algs)
- Edges (between 1 and 4 algs)

Phase 4 -> place pieces

- Corners (intuitive)
- Edges (intuitive)

Can someone help me with the specifics, or at least link me?
 

Lucas Garron

Administrator
Joined
Jul 6, 2007
Messages
3,718
Location
California
WCA
2006GARR01
YouTube
Visit Channel
This is not enough? (And a tutorial video [Grant's?] didn't help any more?)

(Note: I learned from Ryan's page once, and I can get comfortably sub-1 with it - I think I've averaged 40-ish. So, I think there's enough info on that page.)
 

Lotsofsloths

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
1,250
Location
Williamsburg, VA
WCA
2007SAHA01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Mmm..
I don't get the orienting part, I don;t wanna use the alg I use for BLD, but I saw in the video tut something about moving them to one face than turning that face. But I still don;t understand.

Also the last step, that is totally confusing..
 

Lotsofsloths

Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
1,250
Location
Williamsburg, VA
WCA
2007SAHA01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Yes, but I don't get how to solve the edges at the last part.
Also.
@the first part, he says you can put all the edges onto a R or L face, do a singl R or L turn, then they are oriented,,but that doesn't work for me.
 

cuBerBruce

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
Visit Channel
Perhaps you are not understanding edge orientation correctly. First there are two particular groups that are often used as a basis for defining edge orientation: <U,D,L,R,F2,B2> and <U,D,L2,R2,F,B>. (The order the elements are listed within the angle brackets does not matter.) When basing edge orientation on these groups, using only the group generators (the moves listed within the angle brackets), the orientation of edges do not change (by definition, basically).

To find out if an edge cubie is correctly oriented for the <U,D,L2,R2,F,B> scheme, move the piece to its proper location using only the moves U, D, L2, R2, F, and B. If it ends up correctly oriented in its home position, then it was also oriented where it started from. Otherwise the piece was incorrectly oriented where it was at the start.

For instance consider the FR edge cubie at location UL (in either orientation). It can be moved to its home position using U F. If U F solves that edge, then it was correctly oriented at UL. If instead it's flipped, then it was also incorrectly oriented at UL.

If using the <U,D,L,R,F2,B2> scheme, then instead of using U F (since F is not a generator for that group), use L F2 (U U R R R also works).

In the "Post 1" section of Ryan's description, G1 is defined as <L2,R2,F,B,U,D>. But in the "Post 2" section, he changes G1 to be <L2,R2,F,B,U,D>. So this inconsistency might be one thing that's confusing you. Interestingly, Thistlethwaite's original paper didn't use either of these groups for G1. It used <U2,D2,L,R,F,B>.

If you are interested in seeing the original Thistlethwaite algorithm, use this link:
http://www.geocities.com/jaapsch/puzzles/thistle.htm

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:

pjk

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
6,686
WCA
2007KELL02
SS Competition Results
I like at the bottom of Jaap's page there is a letter from Morwen B. Thistlethwaite dated July 13, 1981 there, and it says:
"Thank you for your letter asking for a copy of my 52-move strategy for solving Rubik's Cube."

Just another thing to look at to see how far cubing has come...
 

AvGalen

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
6,857
Location
Rotterdam (actually Capelle aan den IJssel), the N
WCA
2006GALE01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I find it amazing that somehow Jaap (from Delft, The Netherlands) found out that someone from another part of the world had discovered that 52-move strategy. How did he know?

Back then I thought I was the fastest cuber in the world because I could solve it in about 1 minute and nobody else could do it (except the others I taught and they were much slower). How great would it have been if I had known Jaap back then (I also lived in Delft).
 

cuBerBruce

Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2006
Messages
914
Location
Malden, MA, USA
WCA
2006NORS01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I find it amazing that somehow Jaap (from Delft, The Netherlands) found out that someone from another part of the world had discovered that 52-move strategy. How did he know?

It appears the distance from Delft, Netherlands to Loughton, Essex (near London) is about 300km (straight-line distance). I note that according to David Joyner's book, Thistlethwaite was a colleague of Singmaster, so it seems he was well connected to the cubing world of the time. Thistlethwaite later moved across the Pond.

It's not clear to me how soon Jaap actually learned about Thistlethwaite's work.
 

pjk

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
6,686
WCA
2007KELL02
SS Competition Results
I find it amazing that somehow Jaap (from Delft, The Netherlands) found out that someone from another part of the world had discovered that 52-move strategy. How did he know?

Back then I thought I was the fastest cuber in the world because I could solve it in about 1 minute and nobody else could do it (except the others I taught and they were much slower). How great would it have been if I had known Jaap back then (I also lived in Delft).
What a small world. I'd also be interested in knowing how he found out.
 

AvGalen

Premium Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2006
Messages
6,857
Location
Rotterdam (actually Capelle aan den IJssel), the N
WCA
2006GALE01
YouTube
Visit Channel
I find it amazing that somehow Jaap (from Delft, The Netherlands) found out that someone from another part of the world had discovered that 52-move strategy. How did he know?

It appears the distance from Delft, Netherlands to Loughton, Essex (near London) is about 300km (straight-line distance). I note that according to David Joyner's book, Thistlethwaite was a colleague of Singmaster, so it seems he was well connected to the cubing world of the time. Thistlethwaite later moved across the Pond.

It's not clear to me how soon Jaap actually learned about Thistlethwaite's work.
I know Jaap studied in England. Maybe they actually met? I love cube history.
 

pjk

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 13, 2006
Messages
6,686
WCA
2007KELL02
SS Competition Results
I find it amazing that somehow Jaap (from Delft, The Netherlands) found out that someone from another part of the world had discovered that 52-move strategy. How did he know?

It appears the distance from Delft, Netherlands to Loughton, Essex (near London) is about 300km (straight-line distance). I note that according to David Joyner's book, Thistlethwaite was a colleague of Singmaster, so it seems he was well connected to the cubing world of the time. Thistlethwaite later moved across the Pond.

It's not clear to me how soon Jaap actually learned about Thistlethwaite's work.
That's good information to know. Perhaps we should contact Jaap to find out. I believe he is a member on this forum.
 
Top