I'm not really sure I understand your post.
You say that you don't want to learn speeedcubing because of the number of algorithms involved. I take it your referring to CFOP (fridrich method). If this is the case, and f2l is discouraging you, then you can easily learn intuitive f2l, as per the video someone has posted above, which is relatively easy. However, there's little point (in my opinion) if you are not wanting to sink your teeth into algorithm heavy OLL and PLL. Even with two look that's still a number of algorithms to learn (I can't remember the exact number off the top of my head but at least 9 or so) and even that's just a stepping stone for the full method.
So if algorithms are the problem there are plenty of other methods that use less algorithms that you could learn. I'm sure someone on here would be happy to point you in the direction of a guide on such a method (sadly I use CFOP and can't help).
You say that you don't want to learn speeedcubing because of the number of algorithms involved. I take it your referring to CFOP (fridrich method). If this is the case, and f2l is discouraging you, then you can easily learn intuitive f2l, as per the video someone has posted above, which is relatively easy. However, there's little point (in my opinion) if you are not wanting to sink your teeth into algorithm heavy OLL and PLL. Even with two look that's still a number of algorithms to learn (I can't remember the exact number off the top of my head but at least 9 or so) and even that's just a stepping stone for the full method.
So if algorithms are the problem there are plenty of other methods that use less algorithms that you could learn. I'm sure someone on here would be happy to point you in the direction of a guide on such a method (sadly I use CFOP and can't help).
Last edited: