Vhls isn't worth it compared to doing normal insert+oll+pll. If you really don't want to leave zz learn zbls, but I would recommend trying zz out. It's just as fast as cfop if you know zbll.Instead of learning ZZ, is it better to learn ZBLS and VHLS (not counting Mirrors and Backslots) if you're still going to use ZBLL? What're the pros and cons of this?
Ah, I misread the question. The zb method is 700 something algs if I recall correctly, and it puts up similar times to cfop. If you want the eoll experience, I would try ZZ out, but I don't the zb for cfop is worth itWhat I meant is, not learning ZZ. Just using ZBLS/VHLS (FR slot only, excluding mirrors) with ZBLL with CFOP, instead of learning ZZ. Is that feasible or just too much work?
You can do exactly that, but there's a point where improving in that results in such minimal time gain that you should learn a new technique.Do I have to learn Cross+1? Why can't I just work on improving F2L and lookahead?
I don't understand.All right, I am back with another query on intuitive F2L vs algorithmic F2L. So here,
What ottozing was implying, as I could tell, was that learning algorithms for F2L can really benefit in F2L lookahead. However, this definitely puts down efficiency which is the strong point intuitive F2L, but is such a compromise worth it in the context of a speedsolve? I would like to seek some opinions on this.
F2L 31I don't understand.
F2L is intuitive, but it becomes an algorithmic when you can do it without thinking. I don't see the difference between those two, so could you provide me with an example of the same F2L case solved intuitively and algorithmically?
It really depends on what you mean by intuitive F2L, because to me everything about F2L is intuitive.
I would consider both intuitive and algorithmic, with the difference that the second one is slightly more advanced.F2L 31
Intuitive solution - R U' R' y' R' U2 R(take out the pair, rotate and insert into the back)
Algorithmic solution - U' R' F R F' R U' R'
What exactly do you need help on? Memorization? Fingertricks? You can find algs for all of these on speedcubedb.com, as for memorization, just group the moves into "triggers", so for example, here's Na:I need help learning these PLL's: Na, Nb, Aa, Ab, Ra, Rb, Ga, Gb, Gc, and Gd. If anybody could help me, it would be very appreciated!
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|A Faster 2x2 Ortega Pi Alg||Puzzle Video Gallery||10|
|Introducing Twisted ZZ-CT: A faster, more ergonomic alternative to normal ZZ-CT||General Speedcubing Discussion||5|
|[Help Thread] How to Get Faster Using the Petrus Method||Cubing Help & Questions||23|
|How to Get Faster using the ZZ Method||How-to's, Guides, etc.||41|
|Using sand to make your cube go faster||Hardware Area||16|